RE: [Xdoclet-user] missing jboss <key-fields/> bug is back

[<MNe...@ta...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcus Brito [mailto:pa...@an...]
>=20
> Em Qui, 2002-08-29 =E0s 12:18, David Ward escreveu:
>=20
> >      @jboss.relation-mapping style=3D"foreign-key"
> > but no this:
> >      @jboss.target-relation-mapping style=3D"foreign-key"
> > Should the "missing @jboss.target-relation-mapping tag" problem be=20
> > entered at sourceforge as it's own bug?
>=20
> Well, you shouldn't ever need @jboss.relation-mapping
> style=3D"foreign-key". XDoclet tries to guess the best relation =
mapping
> style:
>=20
>         * 1-1 always get foreign keys unless @jboss.relation-mapping
>           style=3D"relation-table" is specified;
>         * 1-n gets foreign keys unless @jboss.relation-mapping
>           style=3D"relation-table" is specified;

If we always assume <foreign-key-mapping>, that overrides what the user
would want in the <preferred-relation-mapping> element of the defaults
section.  That's why I modified the JBoss jbosscmp-jdbc_3_0.dtd so you =
don't
*have* to supply one or the other.

You must explicitly set @jboss.relation-mapping style=3D"foreign-key" =
if you
want foreign-key-mapping or you are stuck with the JBoss defaults =
(which is
foreign-key-mapping).

>         * n-n always get relation table.

No problem with this one.

> Got it? @jboss.relation-mapping should only be used to force=20
> a relation table when otherwise a foreign key mapping would be used.

I changed this when I added the ability to supply a
preferred-relation-mapping in the <jboss> SubTask.

Michael