From: Bruce D'A. <bd...@gm...> - 2014-08-06 19:45:59
|
I don't see a problem with adding new algorithms. That's the whole point behind that feature. It would be another issue if we had, say, 20 of them. But we only have a handful? On Aug 6, 2014 3:29 PM, "Rintze Zelle" <rin...@gm...> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Andrew Dunning <and...@gm...> > wrote: > > I’m wondering whether the next version of CSL could provide expanded > support > > for page range formats. > > > I’m sure that one could find some other strange circumstances; there is > > probably some question of how thorough CSL should be with this. > > I'm a bit hesitant to keep adding more and more page range formats. > > > Additionally, could the concept of page ranges within CSL be expanded to > > number ranges in general? I can’t think of any reason, for instance, why > one > > wouldn’t want the style’s number range format to apply to a date range as > > well, and there are some odd cases where it would be applicable to a > volume, > > issue, or series number range. > > My gut feeling is that it's better to have separate definitions of > range formatting for dates and all other numbers, so that they can be > configured separately. Volume, issue, and series number ranges don't > come up very often (in practice and in citation manuals), so we > haven't really thought about whether the page-range-format should > affect them. > > Rintze > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Infragistics Professional > Build stunning WinForms apps today! > Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. > Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > xbiblio-devel mailing list > xbi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbiblio-devel > |