From: <yeo...@to...> - 2015-08-24 01:50:06
|
Dear Fraunhofer members (Johannes Behr, Max Limper, Tobias Alexander Franke), Vicomtech members, and someone who are so much interested in X3D/X3DOM Volume Rendering Component As I mentioned during the paper session presentation at Web3D 2015 Crete, we will commit RadarVolumeStyle, changing the name as DepthMappedVolumeStyle node to X3DOM 1.7. But if we add the depthTexture for polygons, transferFunction fields and xSectionPosition, xSectionOrientation for cutting plane to ProjectionVolumeStyle then we don’t need DepthMappedVolumeStyle. Or add cutting plane field (xSectionPosition, xSectionOrientation) ProjectionVolumeStyle and keep DepthMappedVolumeStyle. Do you have any preference among those options ? To wrap up options, (1) Extend ProjectionVolumeStyle (fields: depthTexture, transferFunction fields and xSectionPosition, xSectionOrientation) (2) Add DepthMappedVolumeStyle (fields: depthTexture, transferFunction fields and xSectionPosition, xSectionOrientation) -> current implementation and it will be pushed to GitHub. (3) Add DepthMappedVolumeStyle (fields: xSectionPosition, xSectionOrientation) and extend ProjectionVolumeStyle (xSectionPosition, xSectionOrientation) * Reference: https://vimeo.com/103145827 Best regards, Yeonsoo ----------------------------------- Yeonsoo Yang Advanced Software Technology Dept. IoT Technology Center Industrial ICT Solutions Company Toshiba Corporation 1, Komukai-Toshiba-cho, Saiwai-ku, Kawasaki, 212-8582, Japan Tel +81-44-549-2457 Fax +81-44-549-2443 E-mail: yeo...@to...<mailto:yeo...@to...> ----------------------------------- |