From: Johan V. <jvr...@sq...> - 2014-11-05 10:49:25
|
On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:16:35 +0100 Federico Fanton <fed...@pa...> wrote: > I'm sorry, I realized I've explained myself poorly: by "timestamp" I > meant that wxGlade writes a > "generated by wxGlade 0.7.0 on [changing datetime]" > and this is what makes Subversion think that the files should be > committed. I know this is easy to say but hard to implement, but I think wxGlade should not overwrite anything unless there are real changes. -- Johan |