From: Matt N. <ma...@lo...> - 2014-05-03 00:31:44
|
On 02/05/2014, at 6:47 PM, Jürgen Rohrbach <jue...@xs...> wrote: > Hello, > > i have found a solution. when i change the > - Send Buffer Size > - Receive Buffer Size > > in the Load Balancing and Adapter Settings to 65536 > the speed is good. Great! > if i empty the fields and change the settings the speed is very slow. > i never changed this values before. > i seems that the default values changed on mavericks. > is there a way to get the default values? > I may be wrong but I think the default value in the Wonder version is also left blank. Regards, Matt -- http://logicsquad.net > Thanks, > > Jürgen > > > <Bild 10.png> > > > > > Am 02.05.2014 um 09:51 schrieb Matt Ness: > >> Hi again, >> >> 1) I would still recommend it - at least some multiple of your block size, and at the very least a power of 2 value. >> >> 2) terminal: > stat -f "%k" [some file] >> >> eg. >> >>> cd >>> stat -f "%k" .bash_history >> >> >> for me the result would mostly be : >> 4096 >> >> I believe that's the way to do it ;) >> >> >> 3) Just out of interest, is there a defined reason to use octet-string? Looks like you are presenting a Tagged Image as a download. I've not seen octet-string used for tif(f)s before, I've always used octet-stream. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Matt >> -- >> http://logicsquad.net >> >> >> >> On 02/05/2014, at 4:24 PM, Jürgen Rohrbach <jue...@xs...> wrote: >> >>> Hello Matt, >>> >>> thanks for your response. >>> >>> 1) changing the buffer size to smaller values does not solve the problem. >>> >>> 2) it is a new mac pro with a ssd hd. where can i get/set the system block size? >>> >>> 3) no, same speed. >>> >>> >>>> Hi Jürgen, >>>> >>>> What happens when you set your buffer size to a smaller value, 4096, 8192, or at least a power of 2 value? >>>> >>>> What is the file system block size for the system you are serving from? >>>> >>>> Is there a speed difference when you use "application/octet-stream"? >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Matt >>>> -- >>>> http://logicsquad.net >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 29/04/2014, at 9:59 PM, Jürgen Rohrbach <jue...@xs...> wrote: >>>> >>>>> hello, >>>>> >>>>> i have a empty erxapplication with only on direct action. >>>>> the direct action streams a large file. >>>>> the problem is that i only get about 120kB/s download speed. >>>>> does anybody have a solutions for this problem? >>>>> this problem does not exits perior to mavericks! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> public WOActionResults downloadAction() throws Exception { >>>>> WOResponse aResponse = WOApplication.application >>>>> ().createResponseInContext(null); >>>>> >>>>> // contentTyp >>>>> String contentType = "application/octet-string"; >>>>> String filepath = "large.tif"; >>>>> >>>>> aResponse.setHeader(contentType, "Content-type"); >>>>> File f = new File(filepath); >>>>> int bufferSize = 10000000; >>>>> aResponse.setContentStream(new FileInputStream(f), bufferSize, >>>>> (long) f.length()); >>>>> String fileName = NSPathUtilities.lastPathComponent( filepath ); >>>>> aResponse.setHeader("inline; filename="+fileName, "Content- >>>>> disposition"); >>>>> return aResponse; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE >>>>> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get >>>>> unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. >>>>> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Wonder-disc mailing list >>>>> Won...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wonder-disc >>>> >>> >> > |