From: Tim K. <tkl...@ap...> - 2007-01-26 19:37:21
|
Thanks, Chuck! I am now adjusting my models and my attitude. TNK On Jan 25, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: > > On Jan 25, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Tim Kliewer wrote: >> >> Bottom line is that I have my application working as long as the >> entities in my framework's model point to their java classes using >> their full package specified class. >> This is an acceptable change to make, it was just a minor >> inconvenience. I would still prefer to not make it. > > I don't know if I can say that having the fully package specified > class name in the EOModel is an absolute requirement, but whether > you are using Wonder or not, it is a _very_ good idea. If you > don't do this, you are at WebObject's mercy as it has to guess at > which class you mean. When it can't guess, or guesses wrong, bad > things result. Myself, I _always_ include the package name. > > Chuck > > -- > > Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their > overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific > problems. > http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects |