From: Mike O. <ir...@ms...> - 2001-04-12 21:37:04
|
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 12:41:40AM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote: > Performancewise you > lose a lot with many template pieces, because they are > not cached (I lose around 30 request / second even for > the simplest pages). Any chance to improve that? Hi, Tom. What would you suggest to be cached and how would you go about implementing it? -- -Mike (Iron) Orr, ir...@ms... (if mail problems: ms...@ji...) http://mso.oz.net/ English * Esperanto * Russkiy * Deutsch * Espan~ol |