From: Tom S. <tom...@li...> - 2001-02-15 02:38:50
|
Terrel Shumway wrote: > > Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > > > At 11:25 AM 2/14/2001 -0800, Terrel Shumway wrote: > > >Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > > > > > > > If anyone is interested, our website at http://webware.sourceforge.net/, > > > > could use an overhaul. > > > > > > > > I like the look of http://www.mozilla.org. I would like to see popular > > > > links in a sidebar. > > > > mozilla.org is pretty static. One way to deploy is to use Webware to > create the site, and suck up all the pages into a tarball and publish. > A few dynamic pages could be run with OneShot.cgi > > > > > Jay found a service provider for which it looks like you can control > > Apache, and therefore use mod_webkit. > > That sounds like a very liberal hosting provider. I am interested. > > > And I'm trying to reach the owner of > > webware.org to see if we can obtain it. > > > > python-webware.org and webware-python.org are available, > and perhaps are better names anyway. webware.org seems > pretty generic (not python-specific). (webware4python.org > is also available, but it is pretty lame.) > > > If everything works out, we'll have a Webware-driven webware.org site. > > > > See http://www.transafari.com/webware/ for a blatant rip-off. Mozilla.org > really does have a good organization. looks nice (if you like the mozilla look ;-)) try 1 pixel borders (not this big black ones) with smaller cellspacings and cellpaddings It will look much more distinguished.. just my 2 cents -- Tom Schwaller http://www.linux-community.de |