From: Ian B. <ia...@co...> - 2004-03-31 05:02:54
|
On Mar 30, 2004, at 8:32 PM, Jason Hildebrand wrote: > Hi Ian, > > I noticed recently that the transaction object (and by proxy the > session > object) aren't involved in the awake-respond-sleep cycle anymore, as a > result of the restructuring you did a few months back. > > I'm just wondering if this was an intentional change or an oversight. > At very > least the session needs to participate in the cycle so that its > _lastAccessTime attribute gets updated (or else this needs to be > restructured so that it works differently). Mmm... yes, I think that was just an oversight. I just wanted to move the cycle into the servlet, but I guess I missed copying over that part of the cycle. Ian |