Re: [Webware-discuss] forwarding req.values ?

[Jeremy K. <jk...@st...>]

At this stage I believe with one or two unwary steps we could head down
the road of religious debate...so I'll tread carefully.
=20
I will say, however, that when I separate model from view from
controller, one of my own personal motivations is to have the code
workspace that the view designer plays/works in be uncluttered by model
and view code.  As a result, I would never put any model code into a
template or psp file.  If you find yourself writing sql or database
access code in a psp file thats a pretty good sign you've wandered off
the path a bit.  Its possible I misunderstood what you're saying, so
take my words with a grain of salt.
=20
And, as with all religions, you have to decide what you believe in and
what fits your circumstance best.
=20
tabs suck, spaces RULE!!!
=20
jd

  _____ =20

From: web...@li...
[mailto:web...@li...] On Behalf Of
maker joe
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 11:08 PM
To: Discussion of Webware for Python including feedback and proposals.
Subject: Re: [Webware-discuss] forwarding req.values ?


hi all
=20
tim thank you for you clear response and also thank you all for your
time and examples
=20
im still thinking that psp is the best and easy way to have the job done
on a MVC scenario
=20
all modeling/controller and db connections files  are going to be built
inside psp files  <% %>  that shoud be included on view psp files,
rendering all html (produced by a wysyswyg page builder including all
needed    <%=3Drercords/vars %>)=20
=20
psp compiler takes care of all PY code an generate the classes
automatically for me
including all webkit page and the related servlets
=20
to handle vars thru out the servlets i will use post/get and mostly
session
=20
if anybody thinks that im wrong in anyway i would like to have an input
to clarify myself once more
=20
by the way i also would like to know if there is a place to upload my
snippets or download of someone else  and have the way to run them as a
WEBWARESTORE of online running examples to discuss and or learn at the
same time=20
=20
best regards
makerjoe (jose luis hrydziuszko)-(argentina)
=20


=20
On 12/5/06, Tim Roberts <ti...@pr...> wrote:=20

	On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:21:22 -0300, <mak...@gm...> wrote:=20
	> hi chris:
	> if I avoid "trans.application().forward(trans, 'list.psp')"
	> <%
	> req.setField('ww', ww)
	> req.setField('rr', rr)
	> req.setField('xx', xx)
	> ###################   trans.application().forward(trans,
'list.psp')
	> %>
	> <form action=3D"list.psp" method=3D"post">
	> <INPUT type=3D"hidden" name=3D"aa" value=3D"<%=3Daa%>">=20
	> <INPUT type=3D"hidden" name=3D"bb" value=3D"<%=3Dbb%>">
	> <INPUT type=3D"hidden" name=3D"cc" value=3D"<%=3Dcc%>">
	>
	> Does all req.values (aa,bb,cc,ww,rr,xx)will be send to
list.psp ?
	>
=09
	No.  req.setField only affects other consumers of this request
in
	Webware.  When you use forward(), the same request object will
be
	inherited by the new script, so it will see them.  In the case
you have=20
	there, you are writing HTML back to the web browser, at which
point this
	request object will be deleted.  The response from the client's
browser
	represents a brand-new request, and will only contain those
variables=20
	that you wrote in the HTML form.
=09
	--
	Tim Roberts, ti...@pr...
	Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
=09
=09
=09
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-=20
	Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
	Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance
to share your
	opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and
earn cash
=09
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D=
DEVDE
V
	_______________________________________________
	Webware-discuss mailing list
	Web...@li...
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
=09