[Webware-discuss] WSGIKit and Webware

[Winston W. <win...@ca...>]

I've been thinking about future directions for Webware and WSGIKit. =20
What do you think about shifting Webware into a WSGI container, with=20
WSGIKit as one possible containee?  Advantages would be greater=20
separation of concerns, and easier testing.  Perhaps more flexibility=20
if lots of WSGI clients become available.

Here are the responsiblities of Webware that I can come up with.  The=20
first five would be handled by the Webware container, and the last=20
three would be handled by the WSGI "client" if that's the proper term.

	=95 Interface with Apache or provide built-in web server
	=95 Decode URIs and choose the servlet to call
	=95 Contain broken pages so it doesn't break the rest of the =
site
	=95 Produce error reports when pages break.
	=95 Speed development by auto-reloading when source has changed.

	=95 Manage sessions
	=95 Build an HTTP response with headers, cookies, and so forth.
	=95 Write HTML

Comments?

_________________________________________
winston wolff - (646) 827-2242 - http://www.stratolab.com - learning by=20=

creating=