From: Matt F. <ma...@da...> - 2003-03-02 05:30:40
|
Ian Bicking wrote: >there when you needed it. It also doesn't force you to make a page >public or not public -- a page could be public sometimes and private >others. The SecurePage style doesn't allow that, and I don't really see > > That's a very good point. If we were to use a separate User/user validation class/process, it would be tricky to make it still work in a general way (which it would have to be if it were in stock page.py). I know that you don't like that idea, but that's how we do it now, so maybe I can't get outside of my box. |