Re: [Webware-discuss] _actions_ and extraURLs in CVS

[Stephan D. <ste...@gm...>]

The sad thing is that this bug is known for quite a long time
(see http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=104866&group_id=4866&func=browse)
But hey, maybe one of the gurus who understands the Application.py code will 
have a look at it.

Stephan

On Tuesday 29 October 2002 17:53, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > I started using Webware CVS and my PyDiddy-Wiki stopped working :(
> > There are two problems. First extraURLPath seems to have changed and
> > uses a new algorithm. So my old code:
> >
> >  path_info = self.request().extraURLPath()
> >
> > gives an empty path_info.
>
> I can provide some more information on this problem, that seems not so
> easy to solve, as I expected.
>
> One of the bad guys seems to be serverSideInfoForRequestNewAlgorithm() in
> Application.py.
>
> Here I get different paths computed by the old and by the new
> algorithm. Example, when calling
> http://localhost/wk.cgi/pydiddy/EditingTips:
>
>   serverSideInfo should be:
> ('/dos/ibm/hdc18/f/src/python/webware/workdir/pydiddy/Main.py',
> '/dos/ibm/hdc18/f/src/python/webware/workdir/pydiddy', 'pydiddy')
> EditingTips serverSideInfo is      :
> ('/dos/ibm/hdc18/f/src/python/webware/workdir/pydiddy/Main.py',
> '/dos/ibm/hdc18/f/src/python/webware/workdir/pydiddy', 'pydiddy')
>
> (sorry for the long paths)
>
> "pydiddy" is the context, "EditingTips" is part of the extraURLPath,
> or better, it should be.  I tried to narrow down, why this is removed
> from the extraURL. What puzzles me a bit is, that the current
> request's urlPath() is empty. I changed Application.py a bit to have
> serverSideInfoForRequestNewAlgorithm() print out the urlPath
>
> 		print 'serverSideInfo should be:', info, extraPath
>
> 		fullPath = request.urlPath()
> 		print "fullPath: %s" % fullPath
>
> and then I get this in the logs:
>   fullPath: /pydiddy/
> when I thought, that should be "/pydiddy/EditingTips", or am I wrong?
>
> I more and more get the feeilg, that something here is very wrong, but
> I have no idea, what this might be.
>
> ciao