From: Chuck E. <ChuckEsterbrook@StockAlerts.com> - 2002-08-12 13:10:32
|
On Monday 12 August 2002 06:05 am, Geoff Talvola wrote: > I take it you don't want the overhead of calling a method, otherwise > you would have just defined a method that returned a bool. Correct. > One possibility without changing the PSP syntax is to write 2 base > classes in a Python module, whose sole purpose is to provide a > setting for shouldFooBar. Then multiply inherit from the appropriate > base class: For my foo.psp, I simply created a "foo_base.py" in the same directory to set the value and in the psp said: <%@ page extends="foo_base" %> I still think <psp:set> should exist for the same reasons the docs say that <psp:method> exists. Obviously, this is merely a refinement, not anything critical. -Chuck |