From: Jay L. <js...@js...> - 2001-08-12 20:46:24
|
I've committed this to CVS. I used the subclass version. Jay Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > At 02:05 PM 8/11/2001 -0400, Jay Love wrote: > >> It is more code. I'm not suggesting pushing this back to python, >> because I think cgi needs a bigger rewrite. >> >> This code does not assume that cgi will keep the parse_qs code that >> is mentioned to be likely to disappear in the cgi file. The short >> version assumed that code would stick around. > > > My pref would be to use parse_qs. Things don't disappear until they do > and we could always grab a copy of the code from Py 2.1 if 2.2 or > whatever drops it. > > -Chuck > > > _______________________________________________ > Webware-discuss mailing list > Web...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss |