RE: [Webreports-uedesign] Re: Webreports technical implementation subgroup

[raquel.palermo <raq...@ne...>]

Hi
=20
I really like the ideia of 3 or 4 levels of editing, lists...=20
=20
I collected some data in the portuguese meeting, but i am still waiting =
to speak to all the teachers. I'll have a meeting next week and, then, =
make a list with all the suggestions made.=20
=20
In the meanwhile, one of the questions was if it is possible to allow =
the kids to choose a name when saving the documents from TT to the =
computer or (in the future) to the webreport, because it's toonktalk who =
saves with the name it choses and some times it's hard time for the =
finds to find one among several.
=20
I would like to create a personal page in wiki. How can i do that?
=20
For Yishay: The portuguese wiki may be put together this week. Ricardo =
is working on that.
=20
Regards
=20
Raquel

	-----Mensagem original-----=20
	De: web...@li... em nome de Yishay =
Mor=20
	Enviada: seg 9/22/2003 12:00 PM=20
	Para: Jakob Tholander=20
	Cc: web...@li...; =
web...@li...=20
	Assunto: [Webreports-uedesign] Re: Webreports technical implementation =
subgroup
=09
=09

	I absolutely agree. (both with the content, and with the =
classification,
	which is why I added the design group to the addressies)
=09
	On our 1st attempt at having kids write a report we used MS word.  Kids
	spent most of the time selecting background colours, fonts, etc. Not
	that styling and personalization is not important, but it should go =
only
	so far as it is not counter-productive.  I don't know where that point
	is, but IMHO the basic wikimarkup options are more or less what we
	want.  If we had a WYSIWYG editor, it should only go as far as that.
	i.e., 3-4 levels of headings, lists, links tables and embedding media.
=09
	- Yishay
=09
	Jakob Tholander wrote:
=09
	> Actually I think that a WISYWIG editor could have the same effects as
	> a script-like editing, i.e. spending too much time on the actual
	> editing (how to  make their reports look nice) rather than supporting
	> the kids in thinking about the content of what they are reporting.
	> What I believe the kids will need is some kind of structured support
	> (in the form of dialogues or templates) for creating their reports
	> and  we really should draw on the quite extensive CSCL research from
	> CSILE/Knowledge Forum people on this kind of scaffolding.
	>
	> Of course this is primarily an issue for the "design group" but I =
will
	> definitely not be able to stay out of the discussion ;-)
	>
	> Regards
	>
	> Jakob
	>
	>
	> At 15:48 2003-09-17 +0100, you wrote:
	>
	>> What R & C wanted was a WYSIWYG editor, which could be overlaid on
	>> top of the Wiki.  I think it was agreed that anything other than
	>> developing on top of JSPWiki would be too resource demanding.  You'd
	>> have to build all the engines from scratch, which are 10 times more
	>> complicated than the interface.
	>
	**********************************************************************
	Yishay Mor
	           =
http://ioewebserver.ioe.ac.uk/ioe/cms/get.asp?cid=3D4381&4381_0=3D7303
	           y....@io...  Ph +44(0)20 7612 6963 F +44(0)20 7612 6964
	           AIM,Yahoo: yishaym; Jabber: yi...@ja...; ICQ: =
179772099
	         =20
	           If this helped you, please take the time to rate the value =
of this post:
	           http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=3Dyishaym
	**********************************************************************
	celebrating 100 years of excellence in education
	                www.ioe.ac.uk/centenary
=09
=09
=09
=09
	-------------------------------------------------------
	This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
	Welcome to geek heaven.
	http://thinkgeek.com/sf
	_______________________________________________
	Webreports-uedesign mailing list
	Web...@li...
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webreports-uedesign
=09