From: Joe C. <jo...@vi...> - 2009-06-18 09:17:30
|
Oh. We're not speaking the same language here. A mail user doesn't have to have FTP access, just give them a shell that isn't in /etc/shells. So, of _course_ you can have mailboxes without FTP access. In fact, I generally don't see any reason to give mail users FTP access _ever_. Jeremy Jefferson wrote: > The problem is not disk quotas or disk space. I want to let users have > a very high number of email accounts if needed, but I don't want them > being able to create so many FTP accounts that they could start giving > them away as a FTP hosting service or something. > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Jamie Cameron <mailto:jca...@we...> > *To:* Webmin users list <mailto:web...@li...> > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 17, 2009 3:27 AM > *Subject:* Re: [webmin-l] Limit FTP and Email Seperatly > > I guess it could be, if there was enough demand. However, both mail > and FTP users use up the same 'resources' on the system, as they are > just regular unix users. And you can setup disk quotas if you are > concerned about disk space. > > So I don't see a lot of benefit from having separate limits on mail > and FTP accounts.. |