From: Chris Z. <cz...@wc...> - 2007-10-21 00:17:28
|
Well, I'm not going to contradict you (or any of the developers) on your points. I will point out that the virtual users setup as I've done in Postfix is not through third party patches, but in the base Postfix support. It was not my intention to cause an issue. On 10/20/07, Joe Cooper <jo...@vi...> wrote: > > I'll chime in to point out that anything that requires third party > patches to Postfix is verboten (i.e. I'm going to yell at Jamie if he > wastes development time on supporting it). As Jamie mentioned, this > kind of virtual user is just bad business, in general, and when you have > to add patches to make it work, at all, it's even worse. Using standard > tools and users is the path to UNIX enlightenment. > > Maybe we should instead focus on writing an automatic user conversion > script so you can fix your system. ;-) > > Chris Zimmerman wrote: > > While I'm not doing it, it appears you can: > > http://vda.sourceforge.net/ > > > > On 10/20/07, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote: > >> Can the max mailbox be set on a per-user basis though? > >> > >> On 20/Oct/2007 14:52 Chris Zimmerman wrote .. > >> > >> For permissions on the files, yes. I have it configured to use UID > 1006 > >> (vmail user) and GID 8 (mail). > >> > >> For quotas, could you not use the Postfix config in main.cf for max > >> mailbox size? > >> > >> Thanks! > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > |