Re: [War-devel] Design doc

[Thomas L. <tl...@en...>]

How about setting up the first version in Word97, and generating a HTML
version and dump the word stuff?

That way it is easier to get started, and we will be fully open after
that point.

I haven't checked out the new document handler function on sourceforge.
Will take a look.

Weather is good right now, so I have been outside most of the time
(still got 1 week holiday). But I'll get it done by the end of the week!

/Thomas

SamBC wrote:
> 
> I have no pragmatic objection to the use of Word format (provided it is
> Word97 or earlier) but I would philosophically prefer a transparent format
> (HTML/SGML/plain text - although I would have to learn the 2nd one - or some
> suchlike). We are opensource people! Let us be fully open!
> 
> SamBC
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: war...@li...
> > [mailto:war...@li...]On Behalf Of Thomas Lund
> > Sent: 13 July 2000 22:42
> > To: war...@li...
> > Subject: [War-devel] Design doc
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm working on a "formal" design document right now.
> >
> > I found a site with a nice template, and I'm putting stuff into it right
> > now. We should integrate all ideas and rules and stuff into this, so we
> > have a central place to look if in doubt.
> >
> > I am writing it in Word right now. Any problem with that choice anyone?
> >
> > As soon as I have written the stuff I have in my head down, I'll post it
> > here for your comments and also for you to put more text in it
> > (especially SamBC with game rules and unit descriptions)
> >
> > Best regards
> > Thomas
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > War-devel mailing list
> > War...@li...
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/war-devel
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> War-devel mailing list
> War...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/war-devel