From: Jim G. <jgreen@RobotVision.com> - 2006-08-25 15:08:25
|
I'll try to be as detailed as possible. I'm trying to build/install VXL on a AMD X2 4400+ chip box with 2GB RAM running Win2000 SP-4 (I have WinXP-64 but haven't had time to install it yet). I have M$ visual studio 2005 (version 8) and CMake 2.4 patch 3 installed. I try to run CMakeSetup.exe. I specify D:\vxl\vxl-1.6 as $VXLSRC and D:\vxl\bin as $VXLBIN in the two places in CMake. I press Configure and "Visual Studio 8 2005" appears in the "Build For" slot in a pop-up window (which is what I have installed on the box). I press OK and CMake begins grinding, displaying a number of strings in the status bar at the bottom. After several minutes, a number of options appear in red in the Cache Values window. About 24 of these lines are "something-NOTFOUND" values, "something" being either LIBRARY, INCLUDE_DIR, INCLUDE_PATH, or some such string. I click Confugure again without changing any values and the Cache Value items change to grey, but the NOT-FOUNDSs are still listed. It pauses again and the OK button is now not greyed out. I press OK and CMake finishes and the window dissapears. Should I be concerned about these NOT-FOUND values? I then check D:\vxl\bin and there are a bunch of files, but no vxl.dsw file. There is a vxl.sin but no file with the .dsw extension. There is no *.dsw file in the entire D:\vxl tree. The "Installing the VXL 1.6 release" instructions clearly state that I should load the vxl.dsw file into visual studio. I load the vxl.sin file as a project and it loads(!!??) I then build=>build_all and visual studio grinds compiling and linking for a while, outputting thousands of lines in the Output window. After about 10 minutes it finished with: 418>------ Build started: Project: ALL_BUILD, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------ 418>Performing Post-Build Event... 418>"Build all projects" 418>Build log was saved at "file://d:\vxl\bin\ALL_BUILD.dir\Debug\BuildLog.htm" 418>ALL_BUILD - 0 error(s), 0 warning(s) ========== Build: 418 succeeded, 0 failed, 0 up-to-date, 0 skipped ========== Apparently it built successfully, but the install instructions do not match what happened. My question: was this a successful build? If so, why all the NOT-FOUND values in CMake? Thanks, Jim Green -------------------------------- |