From: Peter V. <Pet...@es...> - 2004-09-26 20:23:53
|
I must say I don't see the purpose of the new vsol_digital_curve_2d class. Digital geometry already exists -- it was placed in a separate library (vdgl) but that library conceptually belongs to vsol. The main difference between the old vdgl_digital_curve and the new vsol_digital_curve_2d is the fact that the new one uses refcounted vsol_point_2d's as guide points instead of pairs of double. Which makes it less useful for dense points (which is the main use of vdgl). But with sparse guide points, I don't see a difference between the new vsol_digital_curve_2d and the class vsol_polyline_2d. Hence my question: do we need this new class? It is just causing confusion with the existing digital geometry in vdgl (e.g., by its replacement of cast_to_digital_curve()). -- Peter. |