Re: [Vxl-users] SVD with LAPACK

[David R. <dav...@qu...>]

I would also be interested in this if it makes SVD faster for large matrices
(1000+). I've added vxl-maintainers to the recipients list for this email.

David.

On 8 April 2011 01:29, Yves Martelli <yma...@ci...> wrote:

> Dear List,
>
> I’m using VXL through ITK and am looking at speeding up matrix inversion
> (for big matrices ~5000*5000). I’m using VXL 1.9.0 (from ITK 3.20). I hope
> my question is not too outdated since the current version is 1.13.
>
> From what I understand, the SVD implemented in VNL uses LINPACK. Isn’t
> LAPACK faster? Since LAPACK is already included in VXL, are you planning on
> using it for SVD? Is there (or will there be) a way to switch from one
> implementation using LINPACK to another using LAPACK if people still want to
> use LINPACK?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Yves
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Xperia(TM) PLAY
> It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
> smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
> And it wants your games.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
> _______________________________________________
> Vxl-users mailing list
> Vxl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vxl-users
>
>