Re: [Vxl-maintainers] Promoting vidl2 to core

[Amitha P. <ami...@us...>]

Matt Leotta wrote:
> I haven't seen any response specifically for or against moving vidl2
> to core.  
[...]
> Unless I hear otherwise, I'm going to assume it's alright to proceed.

Just for the record, I'm in favor.

> I've started to write a Book chapter and checked in what I have so far
> to CVS.  It looks like the Book build hosted by Kitware for the CVS
> snapshot hasn't been updated since January.  Is that supposed to be a
> nightly build?

Mea culpa.  It is supposed to be a nightly build.  I'll look into it.

> My plan is to move vidl2 into core soon after the switch to subversion
> (assuming the subversion switch is going to happen soon).  Following
> the vil transition it will be vidl2 --> core/vidl and core/vidl -->
> core/vidl1.

If the existing vidl is going to mean something else after the move, 
maybe we should move the major release version up one after that?  Or 
does no-one really care?