From: Brad M. <bm...@lu...> - 2005-05-17 21:05:06
|
I agree! The folks over on the pythonmac-sig mailing list are doing a great job of building packages that integrate with either 2.3.5 or even better the 2.4.1 build of Python. Both of which have a nice version of idle. It seems like such a waste to me to have to start up X11 to do OpenGL when there is such great OpenGL support native on the mac. I have tried (unsuccessfully) to get the latest versions of Boost, Boost.python and VPython to compile and work together under gcc-4.0 and Tiger. If anyone is interested in collaborating I would be willing to continue to put some effort on this. Brad -- Brad Miller, PhD Assistant Professor, Computer Science Luther College http://www.cs.luther.edu/~bmiller jabber: bn...@ja... On May 17, 2005, at 3:47 PM, Bruce Sherwood wrote: > We have a Mac lab and one of the support people made the following > comment, which I pass along on the chance it will suggest another > possible approach for someone in the VPython community who is > knowledgeable about the Mac environment. > > ---------------------- > I find it much more difficult for me to support the separate > Xwindows vpython. My goal is to get to a native MacOS X > implementation which can be layered on the python that ships from > the vendor. From my stand point if I could just add Numeric and > Visual to /Library/Python/2.3/site-packages and then call /System/ > Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/ > idlelib/idle I am way ahead of the game support wise (no Xwindows > to block logout, no long build sessions, vendor does most of the > work, etc). > > So to that end, the dependencies not shipped with 10.4 appear to be > Boost and Gtk+ (which both have 10.3/4 native builds). I believe > that a full non-Xwindows build of Visual could be done (Numeric and > numarray are already available at http://pythonmac.org/packages/) > but I do not have the resources to put into any development in this > area. There may be other dependencies I am not aware of as well. > > Otherwise: > For the individual user the workaround posted by Aaron Titus is > fine. If you wanted to extend that by creating a platypus (http:// > sveinbjorn.sytes.net/platypus) application which would be a self > contained application of the vpython Xwindows parts from fink that > would be great!! > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes > Want to be the first software developer in space? > Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Visualpython-users mailing list > Vis...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/visualpython-users > |