vda-users Mailing List for Virtual Delivery Agent
Brought to you by:
andernadal
Menu
▾
▴
vda-users — VDA Users Mail List
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(28) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
|
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(7) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(8) |
May
|
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Yagio D. <ydm...@un...> - 2021-08-08 16:28:36
|
Is there a possibility that this project branch resurge? -- *Aviso legal:* El contenido de este mensaje y los archivos adjuntos son confidenciales y de uso exclusivo de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Se encuentran dirigidos sólo para el uso del destinatario al cual van enviados. La reproducción, lectura y/o copia se encuentran prohibidas a cualquier persona diferente a este y puede ser ilegal. Si usted lo ha recibido por error, infórmenos y elimínelo de su correo. Los Datos Personales serán tratados conforme a la Ley 1581 de 2012 y a nuestra Política de Datos Personales que podrá consultar en la página web www.unal.edu.co <http://www.unal.edu.co/>.* *Las opiniones, informaciones, conclusiones y cualquier otro tipo de dato contenido en este correo electrónico, no relacionados con la actividad de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia, se entenderá como personales y de ninguna manera son avaladas por la Universidad. |
|
From: Roberto S. <rob...@gm...> - 2018-05-15 12:51:42
|
Hi, is there any support for postfix 3.3.0 ? Thank you, R. Sebastiano |
|
From: Rodolfo G. G. <rgo...@gn...> - 2018-03-26 18:21:22
|
Hello, I wonder if the VDA patch is still being maintained, and if not, is there any alternative? Thanks, Rodolfo. |
|
From: Jules H. <jul...@gm...> - 2016-09-24 15:08:12
|
Hi dears, I have Postfix 2.10.1-6.el7 installed on a server with YUM. Postfix authenticate Samba4 Active Directory users with success. My goal now is to set up user quota with postfix. So i discover that Postfix most be builed with VDA Patches. I have postfix already running on a production server, and i would like to explain me how to patch postfix rpm with VDA ? Thank you for helping Regards -- Jules HOUANTONON *Phone* : (00229) 97578914 *Email *: jul...@gm... *Skype* : houantonon *linkedin* : www.linkedin.com/in/jhouantonon/en |
|
From: Cristian S. <cs...@ce...> - 2016-07-22 06:23:43
|
Hi, Here are the permanent links to the postfix-vda-v13-3.1.1.patch http://paste.fedoraproject.org/393756/ and https://da.gd/SCZHX Good luck! C. Sava |
|
From: Cristian S. <cs...@ce...> - 2016-06-22 10:03:06
|
Hi all, I ported vda-2.10.0 to postfix-3.1.1 and it is working without problems on our servers. (If you need simlinks fix it please! - see the related threads) If someone need it, here is my postfix-vda-v13-3.1.1.patch and it will last for 1 month: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/383130/ https://da.gd/HF772 If no complains show up I will post it permanently and post the link. Hope it helps someone, C. Sava |
|
From: Cristian S. <cs...@ce...> - 2016-01-21 10:06:17
|
Hi all, I ported vda-2.10.0 to postfix-3.0.3 and it is working without problems on our servers. (If you need simlinks fix it please! - see the related threads) If someone need it, here is my postfix-vda-v13-3.0.3.patch: http://fpaste.org/313115/ http://ur1.ca/ofotv Hope it helps someone, C. Sava |
|
From: Tarr G. <tar...@ma...> - 2015-12-26 20:22:15
|
Hello, Cristian! Could you please share again the postfix-vda-v13-3.0.2.patch again. I'd like to give it a try. Thank you! Gabi. |
|
From: Tarr G. <tar...@ma...> - 2015-12-20 17:53:24
|
tar...@ma... |
|
From: Cristian S. <cs...@ce...> - 2015-12-18 09:30:15
|
Hi all, I need the vda-patch for Fedora 22 & 23 and I did not find one. I ported vda-2.10.0 to postfix-3.0.3 and it is working without problems on our servers. (If you need simlinks fix it please! - see the related threads) If someone need it, here is my postfix-vda-v13-3.0.3.patch: http://fpaste.org/302637/ http://ur1.ca/ocmt9 It will last there for 1 month. If no complain will arrive I'll post it permanent and provide the link. Hope it helps someone, C. Sava |
|
From: Cristian S. <cs...@ce...> - 2015-10-06 10:38:11
|
Hi all, I needed the vda-patch for Fedora 22 & 23 and I did not find one. The http://sourceforge.net/p/vda/mailman/message/32406304/ thread did not help me. I ported vda-2.10.0 to postfix-3.0.2 and it is working without problemson our servers. If someone need it, here is my postfix-vda-v13-3.0.2.patch: http://fpaste.org/275247/ http://ur1.ca/nxe9i It will last there for 1 month. Hope it helps someone, C. Sava |
|
From: Tomáš M. <ma...@at...> - 2015-06-09 08:12:49
|
If you have any testing environment, feel free to try the "-v" option to the virtual agent (in master.cf) to get more verbose output on counting the normal directories and skipping the symlinks. You should not use the -v on the production system, because the output of each email is really long. Tomas > Hello Slavek, could you please try this one? > Tomas > > > On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 14:14:49 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: > >> Indeed, I have 2.8.8 version. >> >> Slavek >> >> W dniu 2015-06-02 o 14:10, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>> And you use the 2.8.8? If you do, I will try to create the patch for >>> 2.8.8 >>> from currently used 2.8.6 and I think this must be working. The >>> copied >>> list below should be a proof for you... >>> >>> Tomas >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 12:20:37 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Tomas, >>>> >>>> The problem occurs with quota recalculation in long term tests.. >>>> I've set maildir quota limit to 2G where: >>>> cur ~ 760MB >>>> .Sent ~ 800MB >>>> and symlink >>>> .test -> .Sent >>>> >>>> After that Maildir has stopped receiving mails. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Slavek >>>> >>>> W dniu 2015-06-02 o 11:11, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>> Hello, I'm just trying to test the version I've sent to you >>>>> previously. >>>>> The patch I have here for my 2.8.6 testing (it's not the one I sent >>>>> to >>>>> you) seems to be working: >>>>> >>>>> (situation after I just sent one email to another 2 that were in >>>>> inbox >>>>> before) >>>>> ===================================================== >>>>> [root@postfix-test Maildir]# ls -l cur new tmp >>>>> cur: >>>>> total 0 >>>>> >>>>> new: >>>>> total 12 >>>>> -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 May 12 10:10 >>>>> 1431418236.Vfd03Ie0013M218661.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 >>>>> -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 May 12 10:13 >>>>> 1431418404.Vfd03Ie0014M767407.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 >>>>> -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 Jun 2 11:03 >>>>> 1433235788.Vfd03Ie0016M427302.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 >>>>> >>>>> tmp: >>>>> total 0 >>>>> >>>>> ====================================================== >>>>> [root@postfix-test Maildir]# cat maildirsize >>>>> 60000S >>>>> 1815 3 >>>>> >>>>> ====================================================== >>>>> [root@postfix-test Maildir]# ll >>>>> total 16 >>>>> drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 May 12 10:08 cur >>>>> -rw------- 1 mail mail 14 Jun 2 11:03 maildirsize >>>>> drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 Jun 2 11:03 new >>>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 May 12 10:12 test_syml_subdir -> new >>>>> drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 Jun 2 11:03 tmp >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> How does it seem to you? >>>>> Best regards, Tomas >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 09:30:47 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> Tomas do you have any good news for me? ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> Slavek >>>>>> >>>>>> W dniu 2015-04-17 o 09:54, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>> Hello, I'm sorry, I was at the vacation almost 3 weeks, great days! >>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>> I >>>>>>> was looking at it about a week before it and was unable to >>>>>>> understand >>>>>>> what >>>>>>> could be wrong. The patch should skip the symlinked files if it >>>>>>> detects >>>>>>> it >>>>>>> with the stat() function as a "soft" symlink. I gonna try it again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:39:01 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tomas is there any chance to look into this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-17 o 14:51, SB pisze: >>>>>>>>> Unfortunately patch isn't working properly. >>>>>>>>> Symklinked folders are count twice.. tested on ~3k accounts. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 15:03, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>> OK, let me know after some time when you'll be sure it's OK. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:52:00 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please give me a week for tests on production server. >>>>>>>>>>> I don't think to explore any unexpected symptoms but it is safe >>>>>>>>>>> term. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 14:43, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>> OK, good to know. >>>>>>>>>>>> Will you do some other additional testings or should I take >>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>> info as >>>>>>>>>>>> that the code works definitely well? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:28:42 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've recompiled postfix again and seems it really works. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Before I must missed that patch, sorry ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:55, SB pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hold your horses! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll check once again and let you know ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll check it out, of course, but I almost cannot believe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-O >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:34:02 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unfortunatelly applied patch isn't working properly. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After installation postfix has dropped quota support: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't created on newrly created account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't updated on any account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - missing ",S=24392:2," at the end filename of each >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delivered >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maildir >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:37, SB pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is really good news for the weekend. I will test next >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let you know about results. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:27, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try this one (see attachment) and let me know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have downloaded the version you use just from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vda.sf.net >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extended the patch. After some initial testing I found >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be working. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:05:22 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I wish you good health speedy recovery ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-02 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No changes, I'm sorry, I was ill the last week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have looked into this and still was unable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reproduce >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my system. I gonna try this again, I did this shortly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Friday >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lazy afternoon... ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:16:22 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any chance to manage this? ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:52, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will let you know when I finish the changes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing. Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it will be the next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:48:18 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed I could test your changes in my system. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it shouldn't be a problem in the future >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> symlink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a virtual mirror of the same directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Btw. I currently use postfix-vda-v10-2.8.8.patch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:25, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will look into this, but I hope, no other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with this functionality in the future. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I'm really busy this week so I cannot spend >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next week will be enaugh for you. Then I will do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neccessary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may I ask you for beta testing on your system? I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> send >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slightly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed version of the VDA patch... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:17:45 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The reason of symlink in that place is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Products >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evolve and unstable directory structure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In Outlook 2013 I cannot setup sent or trash >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Sent Items or .Deleted Items. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Previous versions use another name quotations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is full incompatible with Maldir structure and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be fully >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> synced with e.g. Mobile devices (Two directory >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messages). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I made 'quick fix' for that. and create symlink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aech of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory .Sent Items -> .Sent, .Deleted Items -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Trash. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People in Outlook sees same content on both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directories >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices where I dont need to map Outlook dirs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think if you can exclude symlinks from quota >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> count >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VDA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solve the problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 11:45, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, I don't have enaugh time now for doing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I can look into this when I will craete >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The maildir or maildir++ specification obviously >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about symlinks, so hope we can skip them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have just one queston: is the maildir a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creating >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something like symlinks? I think it's a really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strange >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:01:15 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you fix your patch to ignore account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> symlinks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quota? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Below example. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20K courierimaphieracl >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapkeywords >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapsubscribed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 344K courierimapuiddb >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2,4G cur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K maildirsize >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 32K new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K tmp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quota is set to 3G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now when I create a symlink like Archive -> cur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overquota >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (cur x 2 = 4,8G) while its not true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current usage is still 2,4G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please help. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Media, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thought >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Media, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is >>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and >>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>> >> > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
|
From: Tomáš M. <ma...@at...> - 2015-06-09 07:31:49
|
Hello Slavek, could you please try this one? Tomas On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 14:14:49 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: > Indeed, I have 2.8.8 version. > > Slavek > > W dniu 2015-06-02 o 14:10, Tomáš Macek pisze: >> And you use the 2.8.8? If you do, I will try to create the patch for >> 2.8.8 >> from currently used 2.8.6 and I think this must be working. The copied >> list below should be a proof for you... >> >> Tomas >> >> >> On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 12:20:37 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: >> >>> Hello Tomas, >>> >>> The problem occurs with quota recalculation in long term tests.. >>> I've set maildir quota limit to 2G where: >>> cur ~ 760MB >>> .Sent ~ 800MB >>> and symlink >>> .test -> .Sent >>> >>> After that Maildir has stopped receiving mails. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Slavek >>> >>> W dniu 2015-06-02 o 11:11, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>> Hello, I'm just trying to test the version I've sent to you >>>> previously. >>>> The patch I have here for my 2.8.6 testing (it's not the one I sent to >>>> you) seems to be working: >>>> >>>> (situation after I just sent one email to another 2 that were in inbox >>>> before) >>>> ===================================================== >>>> [root@postfix-test Maildir]# ls -l cur new tmp >>>> cur: >>>> total 0 >>>> >>>> new: >>>> total 12 >>>> -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 May 12 10:10 >>>> 1431418236.Vfd03Ie0013M218661.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 >>>> -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 May 12 10:13 >>>> 1431418404.Vfd03Ie0014M767407.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 >>>> -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 Jun 2 11:03 >>>> 1433235788.Vfd03Ie0016M427302.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 >>>> >>>> tmp: >>>> total 0 >>>> >>>> ====================================================== >>>> [root@postfix-test Maildir]# cat maildirsize >>>> 60000S >>>> 1815 3 >>>> >>>> ====================================================== >>>> [root@postfix-test Maildir]# ll >>>> total 16 >>>> drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 May 12 10:08 cur >>>> -rw------- 1 mail mail 14 Jun 2 11:03 maildirsize >>>> drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 Jun 2 11:03 new >>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 May 12 10:12 test_syml_subdir -> new >>>> drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 Jun 2 11:03 tmp >>>> >>>> >>>> How does it seem to you? >>>> Best regards, Tomas >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 09:30:47 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Tomas do you have any good news for me? ;) >>>>> >>>>> Slavek >>>>> >>>>> W dniu 2015-04-17 o 09:54, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>> Hello, I'm sorry, I was at the vacation almost 3 weeks, great days! >>>>>> :-) >>>>>> I >>>>>> was looking at it about a week before it and was unable to >>>>>> understand >>>>>> what >>>>>> could be wrong. The patch should skip the symlinked files if it >>>>>> detects >>>>>> it >>>>>> with the stat() function as a "soft" symlink. I gonna try it again. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tomas >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:39:01 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Tomas is there any chance to look into this? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>> >>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-17 o 14:51, SB pisze: >>>>>>>> Unfortunately patch isn't working properly. >>>>>>>> Symklinked folders are count twice.. tested on ~3k accounts. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 15:03, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>> OK, let me know after some time when you'll be sure it's OK. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:52:00 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please give me a week for tests on production server. >>>>>>>>>> I don't think to explore any unexpected symptoms but it is safe >>>>>>>>>> term. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 14:43, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>> OK, good to know. >>>>>>>>>>> Will you do some other additional testings or should I take >>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>> info as >>>>>>>>>>> that the code works definitely well? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:28:42 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've recompiled postfix again and seems it really works. >>>>>>>>>>>> Before I must missed that patch, sorry ;) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:55, SB pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hold your horses! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll check once again and let you know ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll check it out, of course, but I almost cannot believe >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-O >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:34:02 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unfortunatelly applied patch isn't working properly. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After installation postfix has dropped quota support: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't created on newrly created account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't updated on any account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - missing ",S=24392:2," at the end filename of each message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delivered >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maildir >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:37, SB pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is really good news for the weekend. I will test next >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let you know about results. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:27, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try this one (see attachment) and let me know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have downloaded the version you use just from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vda.sf.net >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extended the patch. After some initial testing I found >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be working. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:05:22 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I wish you good health speedy recovery ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-02 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No changes, I'm sorry, I was ill the last week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have looked into this and still was unable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reproduce >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my system. I gonna try this again, I did this shortly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Friday >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lazy afternoon... ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:16:22 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any chance to manage this? ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:52, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will let you know when I finish the changes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing. Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it will be the next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:48:18 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed I could test your changes in my system. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it shouldn't be a problem in the future >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> symlink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a virtual mirror of the same directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Btw. I currently use postfix-vda-v10-2.8.8.patch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:25, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will look into this, but I hope, no other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with this functionality in the future. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I'm really busy this week so I cannot spend any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next week will be enaugh for you. Then I will do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neccessary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may I ask you for beta testing on your system? I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> send >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slightly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed version of the VDA patch... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:17:45 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The reason of symlink in that place is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Products >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evolve and unstable directory structure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In Outlook 2013 I cannot setup sent or trash >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Sent Items or .Deleted Items. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Previous versions use another name quotations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is full incompatible with Maldir structure and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be fully >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> synced with e.g. Mobile devices (Two directory for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messages). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I made 'quick fix' for that. and create symlink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aech of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory .Sent Items -> .Sent, .Deleted Items -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Trash. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People in Outlook sees same content on both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directories >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices where I dont need to map Outlook dirs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think if you can exclude symlinks from quota >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> count >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VDA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solve the problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 11:45, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, I don't have enaugh time now for doing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I can look into this when I will craete >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The maildir or maildir++ specification obviously >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about symlinks, so hope we can skip them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have just one queston: is the maildir a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creating >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something like symlinks? I think it's a really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strange >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:01:15 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you fix your patch to ignore account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> symlinks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quota? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Below example. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20K courierimaphieracl >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapkeywords >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapsubscribed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 344K courierimapuiddb >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2,4G cur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K maildirsize >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 32K new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K tmp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quota is set to 3G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now when I create a symlink like Archive -> cur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overquota >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (cur x 2 = 4,8G) while its not true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current usage is still 2,4G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please help. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Media, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is >>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your >>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and >>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >> > -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
|
From: SB <ka...@in...> - 2015-06-02 12:14:59
|
Indeed, I have 2.8.8 version. Slavek W dniu 2015-06-02 o 14:10, Tomáš Macek pisze: > And you use the 2.8.8? If you do, I will try to create the patch for 2.8.8 > from currently used 2.8.6 and I think this must be working. The copied > list below should be a proof for you... > > Tomas > > > On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 12:20:37 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: > >> Hello Tomas, >> >> The problem occurs with quota recalculation in long term tests.. >> I've set maildir quota limit to 2G where: >> cur ~ 760MB >> .Sent ~ 800MB >> and symlink >> .test -> .Sent >> >> After that Maildir has stopped receiving mails. >> >> Regards, >> Slavek >> >> W dniu 2015-06-02 o 11:11, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>> Hello, I'm just trying to test the version I've sent to you previously. >>> The patch I have here for my 2.8.6 testing (it's not the one I sent to >>> you) seems to be working: >>> >>> (situation after I just sent one email to another 2 that were in inbox >>> before) >>> ===================================================== >>> [root@postfix-test Maildir]# ls -l cur new tmp >>> cur: >>> total 0 >>> >>> new: >>> total 12 >>> -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 May 12 10:10 >>> 1431418236.Vfd03Ie0013M218661.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 >>> -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 May 12 10:13 >>> 1431418404.Vfd03Ie0014M767407.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 >>> -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 Jun 2 11:03 >>> 1433235788.Vfd03Ie0016M427302.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 >>> >>> tmp: >>> total 0 >>> >>> ====================================================== >>> [root@postfix-test Maildir]# cat maildirsize >>> 60000S >>> 1815 3 >>> >>> ====================================================== >>> [root@postfix-test Maildir]# ll >>> total 16 >>> drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 May 12 10:08 cur >>> -rw------- 1 mail mail 14 Jun 2 11:03 maildirsize >>> drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 Jun 2 11:03 new >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 May 12 10:12 test_syml_subdir -> new >>> drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 Jun 2 11:03 tmp >>> >>> >>> How does it seem to you? >>> Best regards, Tomas >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 09:30:47 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Tomas do you have any good news for me? ;) >>>> >>>> Slavek >>>> >>>> W dniu 2015-04-17 o 09:54, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>> Hello, I'm sorry, I was at the vacation almost 3 weeks, great days! >>>>> :-) >>>>> I >>>>> was looking at it about a week before it and was unable to understand >>>>> what >>>>> could be wrong. The patch should skip the symlinked files if it >>>>> detects >>>>> it >>>>> with the stat() function as a "soft" symlink. I gonna try it again. >>>>> >>>>> Tomas >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:39:01 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Tomas is there any chance to look into this? >>>>>> >>>>>> Slavek >>>>>> >>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-17 o 14:51, SB pisze: >>>>>>> Unfortunately patch isn't working properly. >>>>>>> Symklinked folders are count twice.. tested on ~3k accounts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>> >>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 15:03, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>> OK, let me know after some time when you'll be sure it's OK. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:52:00 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please give me a week for tests on production server. >>>>>>>>> I don't think to explore any unexpected symptoms but it is safe >>>>>>>>> term. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 14:43, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>> OK, good to know. >>>>>>>>>> Will you do some other additional testings or should I take this >>>>>>>>>> info as >>>>>>>>>> that the code works definitely well? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:28:42 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've recompiled postfix again and seems it really works. >>>>>>>>>>> Before I must missed that patch, sorry ;) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:55, SB pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hold your horses! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll check once again and let you know ;) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll check it out, of course, but I almost cannot believe that >>>>>>>>>>>>> :-O >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:34:02 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> unfortunatelly applied patch isn't working properly. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> After installation postfix has dropped quota support: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't created on newrly created account >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't updated on any account >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - missing ",S=24392:2," at the end filename of each message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> delivered >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> maildir >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:37, SB pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is really good news for the weekend. I will test next >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let you know about results. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:27, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try this one (see attachment) and let me know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have downloaded the version you use just from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vda.sf.net >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extended the patch. After some initial testing I found out >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be working. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:05:22 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I wish you good health speedy recovery ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-02 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No changes, I'm sorry, I was ill the last week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have looked into this and still was unable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reproduce >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my system. I gonna try this again, I did this shortly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Friday >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lazy afternoon... ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:16:22 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any chance to manage this? ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:52, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will let you know when I finish the changes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing. Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it will be the next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:48:18 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed I could test your changes in my system. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it shouldn't be a problem in the future >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> symlink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a virtual mirror of the same directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Btw. I currently use postfix-vda-v10-2.8.8.patch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:25, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will look into this, but I hope, no other user >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with this functionality in the future. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I'm really busy this week so I cannot spend any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next week will be enaugh for you. Then I will do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neccessary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may I ask you for beta testing on your system? I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> send >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slightly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed version of the VDA patch... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:17:45 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The reason of symlink in that place is the Microsoft >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Products >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evolve and unstable directory structure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In Outlook 2013 I cannot setup sent or trash >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Sent Items or .Deleted Items. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Previous versions use another name quotations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is full incompatible with Maldir structure and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be fully >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> synced with e.g. Mobile devices (Two directory for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messages). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I made 'quick fix' for that. and create symlink for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aech of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory .Sent Items -> .Sent, .Deleted Items -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Trash. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People in Outlook sees same content on both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directories >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices where I dont need to map Outlook dirs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think if you can exclude symlinks from quota count >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VDA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solve the problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 11:45, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, I don't have enaugh time now for doing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I can look into this when I will craete patches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The maildir or maildir++ specification obviously >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about symlinks, so hope we can skip them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have just one queston: is the maildir a good >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creating >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something like symlinks? I think it's a really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strange >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:01:15 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you fix your patch to ignore account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> symlinks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quota? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Below example. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20K courierimaphieracl >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapkeywords >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapsubscribed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 344K courierimapuiddb >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2,4G cur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K maildirsize >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 32K new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K tmp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quota is set to 3G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now when I create a symlink like Archive -> cur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overquota >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (cur x 2 = 4,8G) while its not true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current usage is still 2,4G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please help. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is >>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and >>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, >>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your >>>>>>> hub >>>>>>> for all >>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership >>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users > |
|
From: Tomáš M. <ma...@at...> - 2015-06-02 12:10:28
|
And you use the 2.8.8? If you do, I will try to create the patch for 2.8.8 from currently used 2.8.6 and I think this must be working. The copied list below should be a proof for you... Tomas On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 12:20:37 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: > Hello Tomas, > > The problem occurs with quota recalculation in long term tests.. > I've set maildir quota limit to 2G where: > cur ~ 760MB > .Sent ~ 800MB > and symlink > .test -> .Sent > > After that Maildir has stopped receiving mails. > > Regards, > Slavek > > W dniu 2015-06-02 o 11:11, Tomáš Macek pisze: >> Hello, I'm just trying to test the version I've sent to you previously. >> The patch I have here for my 2.8.6 testing (it's not the one I sent to >> you) seems to be working: >> >> (situation after I just sent one email to another 2 that were in inbox >> before) >> ===================================================== >> [root@postfix-test Maildir]# ls -l cur new tmp >> cur: >> total 0 >> >> new: >> total 12 >> -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 May 12 10:10 >> 1431418236.Vfd03Ie0013M218661.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 >> -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 May 12 10:13 >> 1431418404.Vfd03Ie0014M767407.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 >> -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 Jun 2 11:03 >> 1433235788.Vfd03Ie0016M427302.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 >> >> tmp: >> total 0 >> >> ====================================================== >> [root@postfix-test Maildir]# cat maildirsize >> 60000S >> 1815 3 >> >> ====================================================== >> [root@postfix-test Maildir]# ll >> total 16 >> drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 May 12 10:08 cur >> -rw------- 1 mail mail 14 Jun 2 11:03 maildirsize >> drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 Jun 2 11:03 new >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 May 12 10:12 test_syml_subdir -> new >> drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 Jun 2 11:03 tmp >> >> >> How does it seem to you? >> Best regards, Tomas >> >> >> >> On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 09:30:47 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Tomas do you have any good news for me? ;) >>> >>> Slavek >>> >>> W dniu 2015-04-17 o 09:54, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>> Hello, I'm sorry, I was at the vacation almost 3 weeks, great days! >>>> :-) >>>> I >>>> was looking at it about a week before it and was unable to understand >>>> what >>>> could be wrong. The patch should skip the symlinked files if it >>>> detects >>>> it >>>> with the stat() function as a "soft" symlink. I gonna try it again. >>>> >>>> Tomas >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:39:01 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Tomas is there any chance to look into this? >>>>> >>>>> Slavek >>>>> >>>>> W dniu 2015-03-17 o 14:51, SB pisze: >>>>>> Unfortunately patch isn't working properly. >>>>>> Symklinked folders are count twice.. tested on ~3k accounts. >>>>>> >>>>>> Slavek >>>>>> >>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 15:03, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>> OK, let me know after some time when you'll be sure it's OK. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:52:00 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please give me a week for tests on production server. >>>>>>>> I don't think to explore any unexpected symptoms but it is safe >>>>>>>> term. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 14:43, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>> OK, good to know. >>>>>>>>> Will you do some other additional testings or should I take this >>>>>>>>> info as >>>>>>>>> that the code works definitely well? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:28:42 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've recompiled postfix again and seems it really works. >>>>>>>>>> Before I must missed that patch, sorry ;) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:55, SB pisze: >>>>>>>>>>> Hold your horses! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'll check once again and let you know ;) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll check it out, of course, but I almost cannot believe that >>>>>>>>>>>> :-O >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:34:02 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> unfortunatelly applied patch isn't working properly. >>>>>>>>>>>>> After installation postfix has dropped quota support: >>>>>>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't created on newrly created account >>>>>>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't updated on any account >>>>>>>>>>>>> - missing ",S=24392:2," at the end filename of each message >>>>>>>>>>>>> delivered >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> maildir >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:37, SB pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is really good news for the weekend. I will test next >>>>>>>>>>>>>> week >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>> let you know about results. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:27, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try this one (see attachment) and let me know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have downloaded the version you use just from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vda.sf.net >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extended the patch. After some initial testing I found out >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be working. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:05:22 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I wish you good health speedy recovery ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-02 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No changes, I'm sorry, I was ill the last week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have looked into this and still was unable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reproduce >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my system. I gonna try this again, I did this shortly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Friday >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lazy afternoon... ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:16:22 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any chance to manage this? ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:52, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will let you know when I finish the changes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing. Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it will be the next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:48:18 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed I could test your changes in my system. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it shouldn't be a problem in the future >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> symlink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a virtual mirror of the same directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Btw. I currently use postfix-vda-v10-2.8.8.patch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:25, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will look into this, but I hope, no other user >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with this functionality in the future. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I'm really busy this week so I cannot spend any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next week will be enaugh for you. Then I will do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neccessary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may I ask you for beta testing on your system? I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> send >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slightly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed version of the VDA patch... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:17:45 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The reason of symlink in that place is the Microsoft >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Products >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evolve and unstable directory structure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In Outlook 2013 I cannot setup sent or trash >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Sent Items or .Deleted Items. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Previous versions use another name quotations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is full incompatible with Maldir structure and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be fully >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> synced with e.g. Mobile devices (Two directory for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messages). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I made 'quick fix' for that. and create symlink for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aech of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory .Sent Items -> .Sent, .Deleted Items -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Trash. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People in Outlook sees same content on both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directories >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices where I dont need to map Outlook dirs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think if you can exclude symlinks from quota count >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VDA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solve the problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 11:45, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, I don't have enaugh time now for doing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I can look into this when I will craete patches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The maildir or maildir++ specification obviously >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about symlinks, so hope we can skip them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have just one queston: is the maildir a good >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creating >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something like symlinks? I think it's a really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strange >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:01:15 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you fix your patch to ignore account >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> symlinks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quota? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Below example. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20K courierimaphieracl >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapkeywords >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapsubscribed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 344K courierimapuiddb >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2,4G cur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K maildirsize >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 32K new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K tmp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quota is set to 3G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now when I create a symlink like Archive -> cur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overquota >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (cur x 2 = 4,8G) while its not true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current usage is still 2,4G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please help. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is >>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and >>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, >>>>>> sponsored >>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your >>>>>> hub >>>>>> for all >>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership >>>>>> blogs to >>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join >>>>>> the >>>>>> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >> > -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
|
From: SB <ka...@in...> - 2015-06-02 10:20:50
|
Hello Tomas, The problem occurs with quota recalculation in long term tests.. I've set maildir quota limit to 2G where: cur ~ 760MB .Sent ~ 800MB and symlink .test -> .Sent After that Maildir has stopped receiving mails. Regards, Slavek W dniu 2015-06-02 o 11:11, Tomáš Macek pisze: > Hello, I'm just trying to test the version I've sent to you previously. > The patch I have here for my 2.8.6 testing (it's not the one I sent to > you) seems to be working: > > (situation after I just sent one email to another 2 that were in inbox > before) > ===================================================== > [root@postfix-test Maildir]# ls -l cur new tmp > cur: > total 0 > > new: > total 12 > -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 May 12 10:10 > 1431418236.Vfd03Ie0013M218661.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 > -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 May 12 10:13 > 1431418404.Vfd03Ie0014M767407.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 > -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 Jun 2 11:03 > 1433235788.Vfd03Ie0016M427302.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 > > tmp: > total 0 > > ====================================================== > [root@postfix-test Maildir]# cat maildirsize > 60000S > 1815 3 > > ====================================================== > [root@postfix-test Maildir]# ll > total 16 > drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 May 12 10:08 cur > -rw------- 1 mail mail 14 Jun 2 11:03 maildirsize > drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 Jun 2 11:03 new > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 May 12 10:12 test_syml_subdir -> new > drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 Jun 2 11:03 tmp > > > How does it seem to you? > Best regards, Tomas > > > > On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 09:30:47 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Tomas do you have any good news for me? ;) >> >> Slavek >> >> W dniu 2015-04-17 o 09:54, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>> Hello, I'm sorry, I was at the vacation almost 3 weeks, great days! :-) >>> I >>> was looking at it about a week before it and was unable to understand >>> what >>> could be wrong. The patch should skip the symlinked files if it detects >>> it >>> with the stat() function as a "soft" symlink. I gonna try it again. >>> >>> Tomas >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:39:01 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: >>> >>>> Tomas is there any chance to look into this? >>>> >>>> Slavek >>>> >>>> W dniu 2015-03-17 o 14:51, SB pisze: >>>>> Unfortunately patch isn't working properly. >>>>> Symklinked folders are count twice.. tested on ~3k accounts. >>>>> >>>>> Slavek >>>>> >>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 15:03, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>> OK, let me know after some time when you'll be sure it's OK. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tomas >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:52:00 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Please give me a week for tests on production server. >>>>>>> I don't think to explore any unexpected symptoms but it is safe >>>>>>> term. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>> >>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 14:43, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>> OK, good to know. >>>>>>>> Will you do some other additional testings or should I take this >>>>>>>> info as >>>>>>>> that the code works definitely well? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:28:42 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've recompiled postfix again and seems it really works. >>>>>>>>> Before I must missed that patch, sorry ;) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:55, SB pisze: >>>>>>>>>> Hold your horses! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'll check once again and let you know ;) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>> I'll check it out, of course, but I almost cannot believe that >>>>>>>>>>> :-O >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:34:02 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> unfortunatelly applied patch isn't working properly. >>>>>>>>>>>> After installation postfix has dropped quota support: >>>>>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't created on newrly created account >>>>>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't updated on any account >>>>>>>>>>>> - missing ",S=24392:2," at the end filename of each message >>>>>>>>>>>> delivered >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> maildir >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:37, SB pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It is really good news for the weekend. I will test next week >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>> let you know about results. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:27, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> try this one (see attachment) and let me know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have downloaded the version you use just from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> vda.sf.net >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> extended the patch. After some initial testing I found out it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be working. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:05:22 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I wish you good health speedy recovery ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-02 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No changes, I'm sorry, I was ill the last week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have looked into this and still was unable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reproduce >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my system. I gonna try this again, I did this shortly just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Friday >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lazy afternoon... ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:16:22 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any chance to manage this? ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:52, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will let you know when I finish the changes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing. Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it will be the next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:48:18 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed I could test your changes in my system. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it shouldn't be a problem in the future because >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> symlink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a virtual mirror of the same directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Btw. I currently use postfix-vda-v10-2.8.8.patch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:25, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will look into this, but I hope, no other user >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with this functionality in the future. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I'm really busy this week so I cannot spend any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next week will be enaugh for you. Then I will do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neccessary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may I ask you for beta testing on your system? I would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> send >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slightly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed version of the VDA patch... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:17:45 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The reason of symlink in that place is the Microsoft >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Products >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evolve and unstable directory structure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In Outlook 2013 I cannot setup sent or trash >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Sent Items or .Deleted Items. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Previous versions use another name quotations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is full incompatible with Maldir structure and then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be fully >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> synced with e.g. Mobile devices (Two directory for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messages). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I made 'quick fix' for that. and create symlink for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aech of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory .Sent Items -> .Sent, .Deleted Items -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Trash. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People in Outlook sees same content on both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directories >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices where I dont need to map Outlook dirs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think if you can exclude symlinks from quota count >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VDA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solve the problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 11:45, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, I don't have enaugh time now for doing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I can look into this when I will craete patches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The maildir or maildir++ specification obviously does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about symlinks, so hope we can skip them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have just one queston: is the maildir a good >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creating >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something like symlinks? I think it's a really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strange >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:01:15 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you fix your patch to ignore account symlinks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quota? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Below example. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20K courierimaphieracl >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapkeywords >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapsubscribed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 344K courierimapuiddb >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2,4G cur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K maildirsize >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 32K new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K tmp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quota is set to 3G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now when I create a symlink like Archive -> cur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overquota >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (cur x 2 = 4,8G) while its not true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current usage is still 2,4G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please help. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is >>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is >>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and >>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, >>>>> sponsored >>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub >>>>> for all >>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership >>>>> blogs to >>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join >>>>> the >>>>> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users > |
|
From: Tomáš M. <ma...@at...> - 2015-06-02 09:27:44
|
Hello, I'm just trying to test the version I've sent to you previously. The patch I have here for my 2.8.6 testing (it's not the one I sent to you) seems to be working: (situation after I just sent one email to another 2 that were in inbox before) ===================================================== [root@postfix-test Maildir]# ls -l cur new tmp cur: total 0 new: total 12 -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 May 12 10:10 1431418236.Vfd03Ie0013M218661.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 May 12 10:13 1431418404.Vfd03Ie0014M767407.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 -rw------- 1 mail mail 605 Jun 2 11:03 1433235788.Vfd03Ie0016M427302.postfix-test.bezdrat.net,S=605 tmp: total 0 ====================================================== [root@postfix-test Maildir]# cat maildirsize 60000S 1815 3 ====================================================== [root@postfix-test Maildir]# ll total 16 drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 May 12 10:08 cur -rw------- 1 mail mail 14 Jun 2 11:03 maildirsize drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 Jun 2 11:03 new lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 May 12 10:12 test_syml_subdir -> new drwx------ 2 mail mail 4096 Jun 2 11:03 tmp How does it seem to you? Best regards, Tomas On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 09:30:47 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: > Hello, > > Tomas do you have any good news for me? ;) > > Slavek > > W dniu 2015-04-17 o 09:54, Tomáš Macek pisze: >> Hello, I'm sorry, I was at the vacation almost 3 weeks, great days! :-) >> I >> was looking at it about a week before it and was unable to understand >> what >> could be wrong. The patch should skip the symlinked files if it detects >> it >> with the stat() function as a "soft" symlink. I gonna try it again. >> >> Tomas >> >> >> On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:39:01 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: >> >>> Tomas is there any chance to look into this? >>> >>> Slavek >>> >>> W dniu 2015-03-17 o 14:51, SB pisze: >>>> Unfortunately patch isn't working properly. >>>> Symklinked folders are count twice.. tested on ~3k accounts. >>>> >>>> Slavek >>>> >>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 15:03, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>> OK, let me know after some time when you'll be sure it's OK. >>>>> >>>>> Tomas >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:52:00 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Please give me a week for tests on production server. >>>>>> I don't think to explore any unexpected symptoms but it is safe >>>>>> term. >>>>>> >>>>>> Slavek >>>>>> >>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 14:43, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>> OK, good to know. >>>>>>> Will you do some other additional testings or should I take this >>>>>>> info as >>>>>>> that the code works definitely well? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:28:42 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've recompiled postfix again and seems it really works. >>>>>>>> Before I must missed that patch, sorry ;) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:55, SB pisze: >>>>>>>>> Hold your horses! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'll check once again and let you know ;) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>> I'll check it out, of course, but I almost cannot believe that >>>>>>>>>> :-O >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:34:02 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> unfortunatelly applied patch isn't working properly. >>>>>>>>>>> After installation postfix has dropped quota support: >>>>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't created on newrly created account >>>>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't updated on any account >>>>>>>>>>> - missing ",S=24392:2," at the end filename of each message >>>>>>>>>>> delivered >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> maildir >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:37, SB pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is really good news for the weekend. I will test next week >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>> let you know about results. >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you ;) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:27, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>>>> try this one (see attachment) and let me know. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have downloaded the version you use just from the >>>>>>>>>>>>> vda.sf.net >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> extended the patch. After some initial testing I found out it >>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>> be working. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:05:22 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I wish you good health speedy recovery ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-02 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No changes, I'm sorry, I was ill the last week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have looked into this and still was unable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reproduce >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my system. I gonna try this again, I did this shortly just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Friday >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lazy afternoon... ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:16:22 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any chance to manage this? ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:52, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will let you know when I finish the changes and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing. Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it will be the next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:48:18 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed I could test your changes in my system. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it shouldn't be a problem in the future because >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> symlink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a virtual mirror of the same directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Btw. I currently use postfix-vda-v10-2.8.8.patch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:25, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will look into this, but I hope, no other user >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with this functionality in the future. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I'm really busy this week so I cannot spend any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next week will be enaugh for you. Then I will do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neccessary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may I ask you for beta testing on your system? I would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> send >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slightly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed version of the VDA patch... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:17:45 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The reason of symlink in that place is the Microsoft >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Products >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evolve and unstable directory structure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In Outlook 2013 I cannot setup sent or trash >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Sent Items or .Deleted Items. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Previous versions use another name quotations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is full incompatible with Maldir structure and then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be fully >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> synced with e.g. Mobile devices (Two directory for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messages). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I made 'quick fix' for that. and create symlink for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aech of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory .Sent Items -> .Sent, .Deleted Items -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Trash. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People in Outlook sees same content on both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directories >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices where I dont need to map Outlook dirs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think if you can exclude symlinks from quota count >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VDA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solve the problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 11:45, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, I don't have enaugh time now for doing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I can look into this when I will craete patches >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The maildir or maildir++ specification obviously does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about symlinks, so hope we can skip them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have just one queston: is the maildir a good >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creating >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something like symlinks? I think it's a really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strange >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:01:15 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you fix your patch to ignore account symlinks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quota? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Below example. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20K courierimaphieracl >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapkeywords >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapsubscribed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 344K courierimapuiddb >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2,4G cur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K maildirsize >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 32K new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K tmp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quota is set to 3G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now when I create a symlink like Archive -> cur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overquota >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (cur x 2 = 4,8G) while its not true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current usage is still 2,4G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please help. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is >>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is >>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is >>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and >>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, >>>> sponsored >>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub >>>> for all >>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership >>>> blogs to >>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join >>>> the >>>> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>> Vda...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >> > -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
|
From: SB <ka...@in...> - 2015-06-01 07:31:01
|
Hello, Tomas do you have any good news for me? ;) Slavek W dniu 2015-04-17 o 09:54, Tomáš Macek pisze: > Hello, I'm sorry, I was at the vacation almost 3 weeks, great days! :-) I > was looking at it about a week before it and was unable to understand what > could be wrong. The patch should skip the symlinked files if it detects it > with the stat() function as a "soft" symlink. I gonna try it again. > > Tomas > > > On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:39:01 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: > >> Tomas is there any chance to look into this? >> >> Slavek >> >> W dniu 2015-03-17 o 14:51, SB pisze: >>> Unfortunately patch isn't working properly. >>> Symklinked folders are count twice.. tested on ~3k accounts. >>> >>> Slavek >>> >>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 15:03, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>> OK, let me know after some time when you'll be sure it's OK. >>>> >>>> Tomas >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:52:00 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Please give me a week for tests on production server. >>>>> I don't think to explore any unexpected symptoms but it is safe term. >>>>> >>>>> Slavek >>>>> >>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 14:43, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>> OK, good to know. >>>>>> Will you do some other additional testings or should I take this >>>>>> info as >>>>>> that the code works definitely well? >>>>>> >>>>>> Tomas >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:28:42 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I've recompiled postfix again and seems it really works. >>>>>>> Before I must missed that patch, sorry ;) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>> >>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:55, SB pisze: >>>>>>>> Hold your horses! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'll check once again and let you know ;) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>> I'll check it out, of course, but I almost cannot believe that :-O >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:34:02 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> unfortunatelly applied patch isn't working properly. >>>>>>>>>> After installation postfix has dropped quota support: >>>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't created on newrly created account >>>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't updated on any account >>>>>>>>>> - missing ",S=24392:2," at the end filename of each message >>>>>>>>>> delivered >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> maildir >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:37, SB pisze: >>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is really good news for the weekend. I will test next week >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>> let you know about results. >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you ;) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:27, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>>> try this one (see attachment) and let me know. >>>>>>>>>>>> I have downloaded the version you use just from the vda.sf.net >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> extended the patch. After some initial testing I found out it >>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>> be working. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:05:22 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So I wish you good health speedy recovery ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-02 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No changes, I'm sorry, I was ill the last week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have looked into this and still was unable to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reproduce >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> my system. I gonna try this again, I did this shortly just in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Friday >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lazy afternoon... ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:16:22 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any chance to manage this? ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:52, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will let you know when I finish the changes and some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing. Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it will be the next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:48:18 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed I could test your changes in my system. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it shouldn't be a problem in the future because >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> symlink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a virtual mirror of the same directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Btw. I currently use postfix-vda-v10-2.8.8.patch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:25, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will look into this, but I hope, no other user will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with this functionality in the future. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I'm really busy this week so I cannot spend any time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next week will be enaugh for you. Then I will do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neccessary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may I ask you for beta testing on your system? I would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> send >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slightly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed version of the VDA patch... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:17:45 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The reason of symlink in that place is the Microsoft >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Products >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evolve and unstable directory structure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In Outlook 2013 I cannot setup sent or trash directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Sent Items or .Deleted Items. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Previous versions use another name quotations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is full incompatible with Maldir structure and then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be fully >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> synced with e.g. Mobile devices (Two directory for sent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messages). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I made 'quick fix' for that. and create symlink for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aech of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory .Sent Items -> .Sent, .Deleted Items -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Trash. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People in Outlook sees same content on both directories >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices where I dont need to map Outlook dirs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think if you can exclude symlinks from quota count in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VDA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solve the problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 11:45, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, I don't have enaugh time now for doing anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I can look into this when I will craete patches for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The maildir or maildir++ specification obviously does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about symlinks, so hope we can skip them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have just one queston: is the maildir a good >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creating >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something like symlinks? I think it's a really strange >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:01:15 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you fix your patch to ignore account symlinks by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quota? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Below example. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20K courierimaphieracl >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapkeywords >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapsubscribed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 344K courierimapuiddb >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2,4G cur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K maildirsize >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 32K new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K tmp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quota is set to 3G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now when I create a symlink like Archive -> cur system >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overquota >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (cur x 2 = 4,8G) while its not true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current usage is still 2,4G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please help. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is >>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and >>>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is >>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and >>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your >>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and >>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, >>> sponsored >>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub >>> for all >>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership >>> blogs to >>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the >>> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Vda-users mailing list >>> Vda...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users > |
|
From: batou <bat...@gm...> - 2015-04-22 12:19:31
|
ok it makes sense what you are saying to update postfix and then reinstall the patch with dpkg-buildpackage. you were saying debian/ubuntu apt-get works in a way, that it backs up the original (patched version), tries to do the update, and if something goes wrong, it restores the original version. But if you are right I gues all the point is how do I upgrade postfix without using apt-get upgrade (should I compile)? Because I try and then fail and then restore the previous. If this guess was good when I try to send a message over quota I should be still blocked but this doesn't happen. Other weird thing is that the pkg postfix looks same version. *So I tried to reinstall patch (after rebuilding)**when I install this comes out* root@www:/usr/src# dpkg -i postfix_2.11.0-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb postfix-mysql_2.11.0-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb (Reading database ... 101042 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack postfix_2.11.0-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb ... * Stopping Postfix Mail Transport Agent postfix /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_overquota_bounce=yes /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over quota." /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_maildir_extended=yes /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes [ OK ] postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_overquota_bounce=yes postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over quota." postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_maildir_extended=yes postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_overquota_bounce=yes postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over quota." postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_maildir_extended=yes postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_overquota_bounce=yes postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over quota." postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_maildir_extended=yes postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes * Stopping Postfix Mail Transport Agent postfix [ OK ] Unpacking postfix (2.11.0-1ubuntu1) over (2.11.0-1ubuntu1) ... Preparing to unpack postfix-mysql_2.11.0-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking postfix-mysql (2.11.0-1ubuntu1) over (2.11.0-1ubuntu1) ... Setting up postfix (2.11.0-1ubuntu1) ... Postfix configuration was not changed. If you need to make changes, edit /etc/postfix/main.cf (and others) as needed. To view Postfix configuration values, see postconf(1). After modifying main.cf, be sure to run '/etc/init.d/postfix reload'. Running newaliases * Stopping Postfix Mail Transport Agent postfix [ OK ] * Starting Postfix Mail Transport Agent postfix [ OK ] Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-16) ... Processing triggers for ufw (0.34~rc-0ubuntu2) ... Setting up postfix-mysql (2.11.0-1ubuntu1) ... Processing triggers for man-db (2.6.7.1-1ubuntu1) ... Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.19-0ubuntu6.6) ... root@www:/usr/src# ls BUT NOW QUOTA WORKS!!! And look what happens if immediately I try to upgrade.... again there is a new postfix root@www:/usr/src# apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages have been kept back: linux-generic linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic The following packages will be upgraded: postfix 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/1,084 kB of archives. After this operation, 12.3 kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n Abort. root@www:/usr/src# *I start to think that after applying patch just the package is not recognized as "the last" or "the same package" so Im just trying to reinstall the same old postfix... no real update!* I say that because if I re-apply the patch and then try Il 22/04/2015 13.56, Peter Sopko ha scritto: > Hi guys, > > from what I understand, the whole problem is that Walter tries to update his patched version of postfix with a prepackaged non-patched one from debian/ubuntu repositories. If I remember correctly, debian/ubuntu apt-get works in a way, that it backs up the original (patched version), tries to do the update, and if something goes wrong, it restores the original version. > > So from Walters error message, I suspect, that during apt-get postconf failed a few times (due original patched postfix being replaced by a prepackaged unpatched one, thus not knowing about vda configuration directives), and apt afterwards restored the original patched version. That’s why his postconf output shows the variables/directives now. > > If I am right, I don’t think you will ever be able to update postfix using apt-get update (with debian/ubuntu repositiories) if you want the VDA patch. Either update postfix and patch it manually (as you have done it the first time, by building a custom package using dpkg-buildpackage), or find a custom repository that has a maintainer publishing packages build with the vda patch. > > Best regards, > > Peter > >> On 22 Apr 2015, at 12:22, Tomáš Macek <ma...@at...> wrote: >> >> OK, looks like the patch is there... I hoped it's an ussual issue of >> unpatched Postfix, that now can complain about unused variables. But this >> is not the case. But I'm not sure what this should mean. >> >> Tomas >> >> >> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:59:43 +0200, batou <bat...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> Really thank you Tomas for your super quick reply!!! >>> >>> ok consider that before updating and visualize the error I did a >>> snapshot of the cloud server and after I saw there was an error I >>> restored the snapshot without the update (so my server could be running >>> with no issues). >>> >>> If you need to see postconf | grep virtual after the update I need to >>> run a backup snapshot update and run the command. I guess it's nice to >>> see first and after. Give me half an hour for that. >>> In the meantime you can see the result of "postconf | grep virtual" >>> right now >>> (without the update and all is working and putting in bold the >>> parameters): >>> >>> root@www:/var/log# postconf | grep virtual >>> address_verify_virtual_transport = $virtual_transport >>> propagate_unmatched_extensions = canonical, virtual >>> proxy_read_maps = $local_recipient_maps $mydestination >>> $virtual_alias_maps $virtual_alias_domains $virtual_mailbox_maps >>> $virtual_mailbox_domains $relay_recipient_maps $relay_domains >>> $canonical_maps $sender_canonical_maps $recipient_canonical_maps >>> $relocated_maps $transport_maps $mynetworks $virtual_mailbox_limit_maps >>> transport_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_transports.cf >>> unknown_virtual_alias_reject_code = 550 >>> unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code = 550 >>> virtual_alias_domains = >>> virtual_alias_expansion_limit = 1000 >>> virtual_alias_maps = >>> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_forwardings.cf, >>> mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_email2email.cf >>> virtual_alias_recursion_limit = 1000 >>> virtual_delivery_slot_cost = $default_delivery_slot_cost >>> virtual_delivery_slot_discount = $default_delivery_slot_discount >>> virtual_delivery_slot_loan = $default_delivery_slot_loan >>> virtual_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit = >>> $default_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit >>> virtual_destination_concurrency_limit = >>> $default_destination_concurrency_limit >>> virtual_destination_concurrency_negative_feedback = >>> $default_destination_concurrency_negative_feedback >>> virtual_destination_concurrency_positive_feedback = >>> $default_destination_concurrency_positive_feedback >>> virtual_destination_rate_delay = $default_destination_rate_delay >>> virtual_destination_recipient_limit = >>> $default_destination_recipient_limit >>> virtual_extra_recipient_limit = $default_extra_recipient_limit >>> virtual_gid_maps = static:5000 >>> virtual_initial_destination_concurrency = >>> $initial_destination_concurrency >>> virtual_mailbox_base = /home/vmail >>> virtual_mailbox_domains = >>> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domains.cf >>> virtual_mailbox_limit = 51200000 >>> virtual_mailbox_limit_inbox = no >>> virtual_mailbox_limit_maps = >>> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_mailbox_limit_maps.cf >>> *virtual_mailbox_limit_override = yes* >>> virtual_mailbox_lock = fcntl, dotlock >>> virtual_mailbox_maps = >>> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_mailboxes.cf >>> *virtual_maildir_extended = yes* >>> virtual_maildir_filter = no >>> virtual_maildir_filter_maps = >>> *virtual_maildir_limit_message = "The user you are trying to reach is >>> over quota."* >>> virtual_maildir_limit_message_maps = >>> virtual_maildir_suffix = >>> virtual_minimum_delivery_slots = $default_minimum_delivery_slots >>> virtual_minimum_uid = 100 >>> *virtual_overquota_bounce = yes* >>> virtual_recipient_limit = $default_recipient_limit >>> virtual_recipient_refill_delay = $default_recipient_refill_delay >>> virtual_recipient_refill_limit = $default_recipient_refill_limit >>> virtual_transport = virtual >>> virtual_trash_count = no >>> virtual_trash_name = .Trash >>> virtual_uid_maps = static:5000 >>> >>> Walter >>> >>> Il 22/04/2015 12.09, Tomáš Macek ha scritto: >>>> Hello, what says "postconf | grep virtual'? I think I've never seen >>>> messages like "unused parameter", but it could an issue of newer >>>> Postfix's >>>> versions... >>>> Tomas >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:29:23 +0200, batou <bat...@gm...> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi everyone sorry to bug you I would like to know if anyone is using >>>>> the >>>>> patch on an Ubuntu 14.04 systems. >>>>> >>>>> I just installed the patch following this tutorial at step 3 >>>>> https://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-ubuntu-14.04-lts >>>>> Everything went fine and my quota limit is working right now I write. >>>>> >>>>> Notice that before to install the patch I lunched on 18th April apt-get >>>>> update and apt-get upgrade on my system. >>>>> Then the day after if I try to run apt-get update/upgrade the system >>>>> suggests me to update postfix (strangely update will say postfix >>>>> 2.11.0-1ubuntu1 => 2.11.0-1ubuntu1 that it looks same pkg to me). >>>>> >>>>> After that postfix update on my ubuntu server an error message will >>>>> come >>>>> out: >>>>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>>>> virtual_overquota_bounce=yes >>>>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>>>> virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over >>>>> quota." >>>>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>>>> virtual_maildir_extended=yes >>>>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>>>> virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes >>>>> >>>>> Have you any advice how to proceed to remove the warning and be secure >>>>> patch will work (except commenting out the parameters)? >>>>> >>>>> Sorry to take so much time of your attention but I could not find any >>>>> other reference about that. >>>>> Thanks in advance for any kind of reply. >>>>> >>>>> Walter >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT >>>>> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard >>>>> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live >>>>> exercises >>>>> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- >>>>> event?utm_ >>>>> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >> >> -- >> Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT >> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard >> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises >> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ >> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF >> _______________________________________________ >> Vda-users mailing list >> Vda...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT > Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard > Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises > http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ > source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF > _______________________________________________ > Vda-users mailing list > Vda...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users |
|
From: Tomáš M. <ma...@at...> - 2015-04-22 11:33:16
|
Maybe Postfix autors changed the way of variable definition for example. I will have to try to compile it here on my system. On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:53:43 +0200, batou <bat...@gm...> wrote: > ok so after I lunch update I receive this output of apt-get upgrade > (watch in the middle what says also): > > Setting up postfix (2.11.0-1ubuntu1) ... > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > > *Postfix configuration was not changed. If you need to make changes, > edit** > **/etc/postfix/main.cf (and others) as needed. To view Postfix > configuration** > **values, see postconf(1).** > ** > **After modifying main.cf, be sure to run '/etc/init.d/postfix reload'.** > ** > **Running newaliases** > **postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes** > **postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota."** > **postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes** > **postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes* > * Stopping Postfix Mail Transport Agent > postfix [ OK ] > * Starting Postfix Mail Transport Agent > postfix postconf: > warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > /usr/sbin/postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > > Il 22/04/2015 13.22, Tomáš Macek ha scritto: >> OK, looks like the patch is there... I hoped it's an ussual issue of >> unpatched Postfix, that now can complain about unused variables. But >> this >> is not the case. But I'm not sure what this should mean. >> >> Tomas >> >> >> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:59:43 +0200, batou <bat...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> Really thank you Tomas for your super quick reply!!! >>> >>> ok consider that before updating and visualize the error I did a >>> snapshot of the cloud server and after I saw there was an error I >>> restored the snapshot without the update (so my server could be running >>> with no issues). >>> >>> If you need to see postconf | grep virtual after the update I need to >>> run a backup snapshot update and run the command. I guess it's nice to >>> see first and after. Give me half an hour for that. >>> In the meantime you can see the result of "postconf | grep virtual" >>> right now >>> (without the update and all is working and putting in bold the >>> parameters): >>> >>> root@www:/var/log# postconf | grep virtual >>> address_verify_virtual_transport = $virtual_transport >>> propagate_unmatched_extensions = canonical, virtual >>> proxy_read_maps = $local_recipient_maps $mydestination >>> $virtual_alias_maps $virtual_alias_domains $virtual_mailbox_maps >>> $virtual_mailbox_domains $relay_recipient_maps $relay_domains >>> $canonical_maps $sender_canonical_maps $recipient_canonical_maps >>> $relocated_maps $transport_maps $mynetworks $virtual_mailbox_limit_maps >>> transport_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_transports.cf >>> unknown_virtual_alias_reject_code = 550 >>> unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code = 550 >>> virtual_alias_domains = >>> virtual_alias_expansion_limit = 1000 >>> virtual_alias_maps = >>> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_forwardings.cf, >>> mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_email2email.cf >>> virtual_alias_recursion_limit = 1000 >>> virtual_delivery_slot_cost = $default_delivery_slot_cost >>> virtual_delivery_slot_discount = $default_delivery_slot_discount >>> virtual_delivery_slot_loan = $default_delivery_slot_loan >>> virtual_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit = >>> $default_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit >>> virtual_destination_concurrency_limit = >>> $default_destination_concurrency_limit >>> virtual_destination_concurrency_negative_feedback = >>> $default_destination_concurrency_negative_feedback >>> virtual_destination_concurrency_positive_feedback = >>> $default_destination_concurrency_positive_feedback >>> virtual_destination_rate_delay = $default_destination_rate_delay >>> virtual_destination_recipient_limit = >>> $default_destination_recipient_limit >>> virtual_extra_recipient_limit = $default_extra_recipient_limit >>> virtual_gid_maps = static:5000 >>> virtual_initial_destination_concurrency = >>> $initial_destination_concurrency >>> virtual_mailbox_base = /home/vmail >>> virtual_mailbox_domains = >>> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domains.cf >>> virtual_mailbox_limit = 51200000 >>> virtual_mailbox_limit_inbox = no >>> virtual_mailbox_limit_maps = >>> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_mailbox_limit_maps.cf >>> *virtual_mailbox_limit_override = yes* >>> virtual_mailbox_lock = fcntl, dotlock >>> virtual_mailbox_maps = >>> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_mailboxes.cf >>> *virtual_maildir_extended = yes* >>> virtual_maildir_filter = no >>> virtual_maildir_filter_maps = >>> *virtual_maildir_limit_message = "The user you are trying to reach is >>> over quota."* >>> virtual_maildir_limit_message_maps = >>> virtual_maildir_suffix = >>> virtual_minimum_delivery_slots = $default_minimum_delivery_slots >>> virtual_minimum_uid = 100 >>> *virtual_overquota_bounce = yes* >>> virtual_recipient_limit = $default_recipient_limit >>> virtual_recipient_refill_delay = $default_recipient_refill_delay >>> virtual_recipient_refill_limit = $default_recipient_refill_limit >>> virtual_transport = virtual >>> virtual_trash_count = no >>> virtual_trash_name = .Trash >>> virtual_uid_maps = static:5000 >>> >>> Walter >>> >>> Il 22/04/2015 12.09, Tomáš Macek ha scritto: >>>> Hello, what says "postconf | grep virtual'? I think I've never seen >>>> messages like "unused parameter", but it could an issue of newer >>>> Postfix's >>>> versions... >>>> Tomas >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:29:23 +0200, batou <bat...@gm...> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi everyone sorry to bug you I would like to know if anyone is using >>>>> the >>>>> patch on an Ubuntu 14.04 systems. >>>>> >>>>> I just installed the patch following this tutorial at step 3 >>>>> https://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-ubuntu-14.04-lts >>>>> Everything went fine and my quota limit is working right now I write. >>>>> >>>>> Notice that before to install the patch I lunched on 18th April >>>>> apt-get >>>>> update and apt-get upgrade on my system. >>>>> Then the day after if I try to run apt-get update/upgrade the system >>>>> suggests me to update postfix (strangely update will say postfix >>>>> 2.11.0-1ubuntu1 => 2.11.0-1ubuntu1 that it looks same pkg to me). >>>>> >>>>> After that postfix update on my ubuntu server an error message will >>>>> come >>>>> out: >>>>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>>>> virtual_overquota_bounce=yes >>>>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>>>> virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is >>>>> over >>>>> quota." >>>>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>>>> virtual_maildir_extended=yes >>>>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>>>> virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes >>>>> >>>>> Have you any advice how to proceed to remove the warning and be >>>>> secure >>>>> patch will work (except commenting out the parameters)? >>>>> >>>>> Sorry to take so much time of your attention but I could not find any >>>>> other reference about that. >>>>> Thanks in advance for any kind of reply. >>>>> >>>>> Walter >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT >>>>> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard >>>>> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live >>>>> exercises >>>>> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- >>>>> event?utm_ >>>>> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >> > -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
|
From: Peter S. <pe...@so...> - 2015-04-22 11:12:44
|
Hi guys, from what I understand, the whole problem is that Walter tries to update his patched version of postfix with a prepackaged non-patched one from debian/ubuntu repositories. If I remember correctly, debian/ubuntu apt-get works in a way, that it backs up the original (patched version), tries to do the update, and if something goes wrong, it restores the original version. So from Walters error message, I suspect, that during apt-get postconf failed a few times (due original patched postfix being replaced by a prepackaged unpatched one, thus not knowing about vda configuration directives), and apt afterwards restored the original patched version. That’s why his postconf output shows the variables/directives now. If I am right, I don’t think you will ever be able to update postfix using apt-get update (with debian/ubuntu repositiories) if you want the VDA patch. Either update postfix and patch it manually (as you have done it the first time, by building a custom package using dpkg-buildpackage), or find a custom repository that has a maintainer publishing packages build with the vda patch. Best regards, Peter > On 22 Apr 2015, at 12:22, Tomáš Macek <ma...@at...> wrote: > > OK, looks like the patch is there... I hoped it's an ussual issue of > unpatched Postfix, that now can complain about unused variables. But this > is not the case. But I'm not sure what this should mean. > > Tomas > > > On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:59:43 +0200, batou <bat...@gm...> wrote: > >> Really thank you Tomas for your super quick reply!!! >> >> ok consider that before updating and visualize the error I did a >> snapshot of the cloud server and after I saw there was an error I >> restored the snapshot without the update (so my server could be running >> with no issues). >> >> If you need to see postconf | grep virtual after the update I need to >> run a backup snapshot update and run the command. I guess it's nice to >> see first and after. Give me half an hour for that. >> In the meantime you can see the result of "postconf | grep virtual" >> right now >> (without the update and all is working and putting in bold the >> parameters): >> >> root@www:/var/log# postconf | grep virtual >> address_verify_virtual_transport = $virtual_transport >> propagate_unmatched_extensions = canonical, virtual >> proxy_read_maps = $local_recipient_maps $mydestination >> $virtual_alias_maps $virtual_alias_domains $virtual_mailbox_maps >> $virtual_mailbox_domains $relay_recipient_maps $relay_domains >> $canonical_maps $sender_canonical_maps $recipient_canonical_maps >> $relocated_maps $transport_maps $mynetworks $virtual_mailbox_limit_maps >> transport_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_transports.cf >> unknown_virtual_alias_reject_code = 550 >> unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code = 550 >> virtual_alias_domains = >> virtual_alias_expansion_limit = 1000 >> virtual_alias_maps = >> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_forwardings.cf, >> mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_email2email.cf >> virtual_alias_recursion_limit = 1000 >> virtual_delivery_slot_cost = $default_delivery_slot_cost >> virtual_delivery_slot_discount = $default_delivery_slot_discount >> virtual_delivery_slot_loan = $default_delivery_slot_loan >> virtual_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit = >> $default_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit >> virtual_destination_concurrency_limit = >> $default_destination_concurrency_limit >> virtual_destination_concurrency_negative_feedback = >> $default_destination_concurrency_negative_feedback >> virtual_destination_concurrency_positive_feedback = >> $default_destination_concurrency_positive_feedback >> virtual_destination_rate_delay = $default_destination_rate_delay >> virtual_destination_recipient_limit = >> $default_destination_recipient_limit >> virtual_extra_recipient_limit = $default_extra_recipient_limit >> virtual_gid_maps = static:5000 >> virtual_initial_destination_concurrency = >> $initial_destination_concurrency >> virtual_mailbox_base = /home/vmail >> virtual_mailbox_domains = >> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domains.cf >> virtual_mailbox_limit = 51200000 >> virtual_mailbox_limit_inbox = no >> virtual_mailbox_limit_maps = >> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_mailbox_limit_maps.cf >> *virtual_mailbox_limit_override = yes* >> virtual_mailbox_lock = fcntl, dotlock >> virtual_mailbox_maps = >> proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_mailboxes.cf >> *virtual_maildir_extended = yes* >> virtual_maildir_filter = no >> virtual_maildir_filter_maps = >> *virtual_maildir_limit_message = "The user you are trying to reach is >> over quota."* >> virtual_maildir_limit_message_maps = >> virtual_maildir_suffix = >> virtual_minimum_delivery_slots = $default_minimum_delivery_slots >> virtual_minimum_uid = 100 >> *virtual_overquota_bounce = yes* >> virtual_recipient_limit = $default_recipient_limit >> virtual_recipient_refill_delay = $default_recipient_refill_delay >> virtual_recipient_refill_limit = $default_recipient_refill_limit >> virtual_transport = virtual >> virtual_trash_count = no >> virtual_trash_name = .Trash >> virtual_uid_maps = static:5000 >> >> Walter >> >> Il 22/04/2015 12.09, Tomáš Macek ha scritto: >>> Hello, what says "postconf | grep virtual'? I think I've never seen >>> messages like "unused parameter", but it could an issue of newer >>> Postfix's >>> versions... >>> Tomas >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:29:23 +0200, batou <bat...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everyone sorry to bug you I would like to know if anyone is using >>>> the >>>> patch on an Ubuntu 14.04 systems. >>>> >>>> I just installed the patch following this tutorial at step 3 >>>> https://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-ubuntu-14.04-lts >>>> Everything went fine and my quota limit is working right now I write. >>>> >>>> Notice that before to install the patch I lunched on 18th April apt-get >>>> update and apt-get upgrade on my system. >>>> Then the day after if I try to run apt-get update/upgrade the system >>>> suggests me to update postfix (strangely update will say postfix >>>> 2.11.0-1ubuntu1 => 2.11.0-1ubuntu1 that it looks same pkg to me). >>>> >>>> After that postfix update on my ubuntu server an error message will >>>> come >>>> out: >>>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>>> virtual_overquota_bounce=yes >>>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>>> virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over >>>> quota." >>>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>>> virtual_maildir_extended=yes >>>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>>> virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes >>>> >>>> Have you any advice how to proceed to remove the warning and be secure >>>> patch will work (except commenting out the parameters)? >>>> >>>> Sorry to take so much time of your attention but I could not find any >>>> other reference about that. >>>> Thanks in advance for any kind of reply. >>>> >>>> Walter >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT >>>> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard >>>> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live >>>> exercises >>>> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- >>>> event?utm_ >>>> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>> Vda...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>> >> > > > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT > Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard > Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises > http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ > source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF > _______________________________________________ > Vda-users mailing list > Vda...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users |
|
From: Tomáš M. <ma...@at...> - 2015-04-22 10:32:37
|
OK, looks like the patch is there... I hoped it's an ussual issue of unpatched Postfix, that now can complain about unused variables. But this is not the case. But I'm not sure what this should mean. Tomas On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:59:43 +0200, batou <bat...@gm...> wrote: > Really thank you Tomas for your super quick reply!!! > > ok consider that before updating and visualize the error I did a > snapshot of the cloud server and after I saw there was an error I > restored the snapshot without the update (so my server could be running > with no issues). > > If you need to see postconf | grep virtual after the update I need to > run a backup snapshot update and run the command. I guess it's nice to > see first and after. Give me half an hour for that. > In the meantime you can see the result of "postconf | grep virtual" > right now > (without the update and all is working and putting in bold the > parameters): > > root@www:/var/log# postconf | grep virtual > address_verify_virtual_transport = $virtual_transport > propagate_unmatched_extensions = canonical, virtual > proxy_read_maps = $local_recipient_maps $mydestination > $virtual_alias_maps $virtual_alias_domains $virtual_mailbox_maps > $virtual_mailbox_domains $relay_recipient_maps $relay_domains > $canonical_maps $sender_canonical_maps $recipient_canonical_maps > $relocated_maps $transport_maps $mynetworks $virtual_mailbox_limit_maps > transport_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_transports.cf > unknown_virtual_alias_reject_code = 550 > unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code = 550 > virtual_alias_domains = > virtual_alias_expansion_limit = 1000 > virtual_alias_maps = > proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_forwardings.cf, > mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_email2email.cf > virtual_alias_recursion_limit = 1000 > virtual_delivery_slot_cost = $default_delivery_slot_cost > virtual_delivery_slot_discount = $default_delivery_slot_discount > virtual_delivery_slot_loan = $default_delivery_slot_loan > virtual_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit = > $default_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit > virtual_destination_concurrency_limit = > $default_destination_concurrency_limit > virtual_destination_concurrency_negative_feedback = > $default_destination_concurrency_negative_feedback > virtual_destination_concurrency_positive_feedback = > $default_destination_concurrency_positive_feedback > virtual_destination_rate_delay = $default_destination_rate_delay > virtual_destination_recipient_limit = > $default_destination_recipient_limit > virtual_extra_recipient_limit = $default_extra_recipient_limit > virtual_gid_maps = static:5000 > virtual_initial_destination_concurrency = > $initial_destination_concurrency > virtual_mailbox_base = /home/vmail > virtual_mailbox_domains = > proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domains.cf > virtual_mailbox_limit = 51200000 > virtual_mailbox_limit_inbox = no > virtual_mailbox_limit_maps = > proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_mailbox_limit_maps.cf > *virtual_mailbox_limit_override = yes* > virtual_mailbox_lock = fcntl, dotlock > virtual_mailbox_maps = > proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_mailboxes.cf > *virtual_maildir_extended = yes* > virtual_maildir_filter = no > virtual_maildir_filter_maps = > *virtual_maildir_limit_message = "The user you are trying to reach is > over quota."* > virtual_maildir_limit_message_maps = > virtual_maildir_suffix = > virtual_minimum_delivery_slots = $default_minimum_delivery_slots > virtual_minimum_uid = 100 > *virtual_overquota_bounce = yes* > virtual_recipient_limit = $default_recipient_limit > virtual_recipient_refill_delay = $default_recipient_refill_delay > virtual_recipient_refill_limit = $default_recipient_refill_limit > virtual_transport = virtual > virtual_trash_count = no > virtual_trash_name = .Trash > virtual_uid_maps = static:5000 > > Walter > > Il 22/04/2015 12.09, Tomáš Macek ha scritto: >> Hello, what says "postconf | grep virtual'? I think I've never seen >> messages like "unused parameter", but it could an issue of newer >> Postfix's >> versions... >> Tomas >> >> >> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:29:23 +0200, batou <bat...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone sorry to bug you I would like to know if anyone is using >>> the >>> patch on an Ubuntu 14.04 systems. >>> >>> I just installed the patch following this tutorial at step 3 >>> https://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-ubuntu-14.04-lts >>> Everything went fine and my quota limit is working right now I write. >>> >>> Notice that before to install the patch I lunched on 18th April apt-get >>> update and apt-get upgrade on my system. >>> Then the day after if I try to run apt-get update/upgrade the system >>> suggests me to update postfix (strangely update will say postfix >>> 2.11.0-1ubuntu1 => 2.11.0-1ubuntu1 that it looks same pkg to me). >>> >>> After that postfix update on my ubuntu server an error message will >>> come >>> out: >>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>> virtual_overquota_bounce=yes >>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>> virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over >>> quota." >>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>> virtual_maildir_extended=yes >>> postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: >>> virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes >>> >>> Have you any advice how to proceed to remove the warning and be secure >>> patch will work (except commenting out the parameters)? >>> >>> Sorry to take so much time of your attention but I could not find any >>> other reference about that. >>> Thanks in advance for any kind of reply. >>> >>> Walter >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT >>> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard >>> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live >>> exercises >>> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- >>> event?utm_ >>> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Vda-users mailing list >>> Vda...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >> > -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
|
From: Tomáš M. <ma...@at...> - 2015-04-22 09:09:49
|
Hello, what says "postconf | grep virtual'? I think I've never seen messages like "unused parameter", but it could an issue of newer Postfix's versions... Tomas On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:29:23 +0200, batou <bat...@gm...> wrote: > Hi everyone sorry to bug you I would like to know if anyone is using the > patch on an Ubuntu 14.04 systems. > > I just installed the patch following this tutorial at step 3 > https://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-ubuntu-14.04-lts > Everything went fine and my quota limit is working right now I write. > > Notice that before to install the patch I lunched on 18th April apt-get > update and apt-get upgrade on my system. > Then the day after if I try to run apt-get update/upgrade the system > suggests me to update postfix (strangely update will say postfix > 2.11.0-1ubuntu1 => 2.11.0-1ubuntu1 that it looks same pkg to me). > > After that postfix update on my ubuntu server an error message will come > out: > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_overquota_bounce=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over > quota." > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_maildir_extended=yes > postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: > virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes > > Have you any advice how to proceed to remove the warning and be secure > patch will work (except commenting out the parameters)? > > Sorry to take so much time of your attention but I could not find any > other reference about that. > Thanks in advance for any kind of reply. > > Walter > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT > Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard > Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live > exercises > http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- > event?utm_ > source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF > _______________________________________________ > Vda-users mailing list > Vda...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
|
From: batou <bat...@gm...> - 2015-04-22 08:29:38
|
Hi everyone sorry to bug you I would like to know if anyone is using the patch on an Ubuntu 14.04 systems. I just installed the patch following this tutorial at step 3 https://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-ubuntu-14.04-lts Everything went fine and my quota limit is working right now I write. Notice that before to install the patch I lunched on 18th April apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on my system. Then the day after if I try to run apt-get update/upgrade the system suggests me to update postfix (strangely update will say postfix 2.11.0-1ubuntu1 => 2.11.0-1ubuntu1 that it looks same pkg to me). After that postfix update on my ubuntu server an error message will come out: postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_overquota_bounce=yes postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_maildir_limit_message="The user you are trying to reach is over quota." postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_maildir_extended=yes postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: virtual_mailbox_limit_override=yes Have you any advice how to proceed to remove the warning and be secure patch will work (except commenting out the parameters)? Sorry to take so much time of your attention but I could not find any other reference about that. Thanks in advance for any kind of reply. Walter |
|
From: Tomáš M. <ma...@at...> - 2015-04-17 07:54:33
|
Hello, I'm sorry, I was at the vacation almost 3 weeks, great days! :-) I was looking at it about a week before it and was unable to understand what could be wrong. The patch should skip the symlinked files if it detects it with the stat() function as a "soft" symlink. I gonna try it again. Tomas On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:39:01 +0200, SB <ka...@in...> wrote: > Tomas is there any chance to look into this? > > Slavek > > W dniu 2015-03-17 o 14:51, SB pisze: >> Unfortunately patch isn't working properly. >> Symklinked folders are count twice.. tested on ~3k accounts. >> >> Slavek >> >> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 15:03, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>> OK, let me know after some time when you'll be sure it's OK. >>> >>> Tomas >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:52:00 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> wrote: >>> >>>> Please give me a week for tests on production server. >>>> I don't think to explore any unexpected symptoms but it is safe term. >>>> >>>> Slavek >>>> >>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 14:43, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>> OK, good to know. >>>>> Will you do some other additional testings or should I take this >>>>> info as >>>>> that the code works definitely well? >>>>> >>>>> Tomas >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:28:42 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I've recompiled postfix again and seems it really works. >>>>>> Before I must missed that patch, sorry ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> Slavek >>>>>> >>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:55, SB pisze: >>>>>>> Hold your horses! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'll check once again and let you know ;) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>> >>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-12 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> I'll check it out, of course, but I almost cannot believe that :-O >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:34:02 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> unfortunatelly applied patch isn't working properly. >>>>>>>>> After installation postfix has dropped quota support: >>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't created on newrly created account >>>>>>>>> - maildirsize isn't updated on any account >>>>>>>>> - missing ",S=24392:2," at the end filename of each message >>>>>>>>> delivered >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> maildir >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:37, SB pisze: >>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is really good news for the weekend. I will test next week >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>> let you know about results. >>>>>>>>>> Thank you ;) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-06 o 14:27, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>> try this one (see attachment) and let me know. >>>>>>>>>>> I have downloaded the version you use just from the vda.sf.net >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> extended the patch. After some initial testing I found out it >>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>> be working. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:05:22 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So I wish you good health speedy recovery ;) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-03-02 o 13:42, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>> No changes, I'm sorry, I was ill the last week. >>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have looked into this and still was unable to >>>>>>>>>>>>> reproduce >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> bug on >>>>>>>>>>>>> my system. I gonna try this again, I did this shortly just in >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Friday >>>>>>>>>>>>> lazy afternoon... ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:16:22 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any chance to manage this? ;) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:52, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will let you know when I finish the changes and some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing. Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it will be the next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:48:18 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indeed I could test your changes in my system. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it shouldn't be a problem in the future because >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> symlink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a virtual mirror of the same directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Btw. I currently use postfix-vda-v10-2.8.8.patch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 13:25, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Slavek, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will look into this, but I hope, no other user will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with this functionality in the future. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I'm really busy this week so I cannot spend any time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next week will be enaugh for you. Then I will do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neccessary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may I ask you for beta testing on your system? I would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> send >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slightly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed version of the VDA patch... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:17:45 +0100, SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Tomas, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The reason of symlink in that place is the Microsoft >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Products >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evolve and unstable directory structure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In Outlook 2013 I cannot setup sent or trash directory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Sent Items or .Deleted Items. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Previous versions use another name quotations. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is full incompatible with Maldir structure and then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be fully >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> synced with e.g. Mobile devices (Two directory for sent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messages). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I made 'quick fix' for that. and create symlink for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aech of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory .Sent Items -> .Sent, .Deleted Items -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .Trash. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People in Outlook sees same content on both directories >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices where I dont need to map Outlook dirs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think if you can exclude symlinks from quota count in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VDA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solve the problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 2015-02-10 o 11:45, Tomáš Macek pisze: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, I don't have enaugh time now for doing anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I can look into this when I will craete patches for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The maildir or maildir++ specification obviously does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about symlinks, so hope we can skip them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I have just one queston: is the maildir a good >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creating >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something like symlinks? I think it's a really strange >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tomas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:01:15 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SB<ka...@in...> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you fix your patch to ignore account symlinks by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quota? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Below example. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20K courierimaphieracl >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapkeywords >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K courierimapsubscribed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 344K courierimapuiddb >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2,4G cur >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K maildirsize >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 32K new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4,0K tmp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quota is set to 3G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now when I create a symlink like Archive -> cur system >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overquota >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (cur x 2 = 4,8G) while its not true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current usage is still 2,4G. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please help. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slavek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is >>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and >>>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is >>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>> hub >>>>>>>>>> for all >>>>>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and >>>>>>>>>> join >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel >>>>>>> Website, >>>>>>> sponsored >>>>>>> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your >>>>>>> hub >>>>>>> for all >>>>>>> things parallel software development, from weekly thought >>>>>>> leadership >>>>>>> blogs to >>>>>>> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and >>>>>>> join >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> conversation now.http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Vda-users mailing list >>>>>>> Vda...@li... >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, >> sponsored >> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub >> for all >> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership >> blogs to >> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the >> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Vda-users mailing list >> Vda...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vda-users > -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
1 message has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.