From: Nicholas N. <n.n...@gm...> - 2009-02-26 21:15:28
|
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Greg Parker <gp...@ap...> wrote: > > That's correct, Darwin uses its own home-grown assembler. I don't know of > any GAS support for Mach-O, and -mgas is not supported. Greg, do you have any opinion if it's worth trying to use a common subset of the two dialects, or should we just shove all the current failing asm tests into x86-linux/ directories? N |