From: Ali J. <a.j...@gm...> - 2008-01-31 09:11:18
|
Hi Julian > [quick check: you are subscribed to valgrind-developers, yes? > some messages about thread checking go only there] Yes since few weeks i am. > What I can do is to help to provide an evaluation. I can: > > * commit the 64-bit SVal patch, so you don't both have to > include it in your own work I have done some minor changes in your 64 bit schema as I needed in ShM2 lset, tset and TSegments. > * fix the signed/unsigned Word problem that is now in hg_wordfm.c Could be helpful > > * try out your patched versions on OOo / Firefox, and compare/ > summarise results. > > Is that useful? This could be very useful to have an overview and compare the MSMs. I am doing a review on my changes pls use the new patch that I will send you after my revision. I will run Konstatntin unittest with "MSMUnika" and will send you the results. > One comment about your MSM. It is often possible for memory > to change from Virgin ("New" is a better name, imo) directly > to Excl.R. Especially if the application is buggy (reading > uninitialised memory) or due to compiler tricks, where the > compiler loads a word from memory, part of which is uninitialised, > and then does not use the uninitialised part. So you should add > an edge for this transition to your Figure 1. In the new version I changed and got a better results. thanks Ali |