From: Konstantinos K. <K.K...@sm...> - 2007-02-17 14:40:20
|
Hi, I run cachegrind on a AMD Athlon 4200+ 64x2 system and get these results: Cachegrind, an I1/D1/L2 cache profiler. Copyright (C) 2002-2006, and GNU GPL'd, by Nicholas Nethercote et al. Using LibVEX rev 1658, a library for dynamic binary translation. Copyright (C) 2004-2006, and GNU GPL'd, by OpenWorks LLP. Using valgrind-3.2.1, a dynamic binary instrumentation framework. Copyright (C) 2000-2006, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. For more details, rerun with: -v I refs: 3,641,862,524 I1 misses: 1,050 L2i misses: 1,041 I1 miss rate: 0.00% L2i miss rate: 0.00% D refs: 1,355,109,542 (839,732,151 rd + 515,377,391 wr) D1 misses: 2,299,014 ( 1,426,783 rd + 872,231 wr) L2d misses: 1,603,411 ( 812,790 rd + 790,621 wr) D1 miss rate: 0.1% ( 0.1% + 0.1% ) L2d miss rate: 0.1% ( 0.0% + 0.1% ) L2 refs: 2,300,064 ( 1,427,833 rd + 872,231 wr) L2 misses: 1,604,452 ( 813,831 rd + 790,621 wr) L2 miss rate: 0.0% ( 0.0% + 0.1% ) -Are these results valid? The miss rates should be must higher, if they are calculated as references/misses. -Does cachegrind simulate hardware prefetching mechanisms. If yes, does it adjust its functionality to the characteristics of the specific processor? Thanks. |