From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2006-01-30 18:21:53
|
On Monday 30 January 2006 17:01, Ashley Pittman wrote: > On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 20:54 +0000, Julian Seward wrote: > > But VALGRIND_MAGIC_SEQUENCE is a low-level macro used as a building > > block for the higher client-request macros that users should be using. > > So I don't thing there should be a problem. In any case I sure hope > > not since I recently renamed it to VALGRIND_DO_CLIENT_REQUEST as that's > > a more sensible name for it. > > That might explain a few things, I took a private copy of > memcheck.h/valgrind.h a few weeks ago (on the 17th Jan IIRC) and just > found today that they no longer work with valgrind from SVN. Oops, sorry about that. It didn't even occur to me I'd be breaking other people's code. Perhaps we should say, on each macro, whether they are suitable for end-user use or not. J |