From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2004-08-10 13:09:28
|
> > The syscall handing stuff is completely logically distinct from FV, and > > it's complex. But we already talked about that. > > Sure. Perhaps my point is this: worse-is-better is great for getting > things going, but it's not a long-term solution. For example, none of the > big Unixes are really worse-is-better any more (there are some > worse-is-better aspects in APIs, but implementation-wise not so much). I'm kind-of bemused by this use of worse-is-better. All I meant was that to get to a better place we may have to go through a worse intermediate place. I didn't mean that in the end we should settle for something worse than what we have already. J |