Re: [utah-glx-dev] utah-glx & xfree-4.2.0's 2d display driver

[Levent Y. <mli...@ga...>]

Philip Brown wrote:

>On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:08:32PM +0200, Levent Yavas wrote:
>  
>
>>...
>>at this point we have s3savage, nv, mga chipsets working. i think we 
>>should supply those chipsets xfree-4.2.0 2d display drivers in binary 
>>release. with this way, there is no such incompability. we are totally 
>>version independant (or totally 4.2.0 dependant, choose one :) because 
>>xfree version changes will not affect utah-glx development. we will 
>>simply give working set of libraries in binary release.
>>    
>>
>
>ah. okay, I think I understand now.
>
>Well, if you (or anyone else who wants to provide a binary set for
> their favourite platform), go for it.
>
> want to do that, go right ahead
>
>  
>
>>i have another problem, i prepared 'latest-release' binaries for mga, 
>>s3savage, nv with following command:
>>./configure --enable-nv --enable-mga --enable-s3savage --disable-i810 
>>--disable-mach64 --disable-s3virge --disable-sis6326 --without-x86-asm 
>>--without-mmx-asm --without-3dnow-asm --prefix=/usr
>>
>>problem is, mga and s3savage drivers wasn't compiled. my binaries only 
>>have nv drivers, s3savage and mga will not work!
>>    
>>
>
>oops.
>
>Well, maybe you want to take the "savage-works" tag, and add on just the
>latest nv stuff in the nv directory, and if that works better, make a new
>tag.  Or recommend a better layout. 
>It's possible the "latest-release" tag needs to be adjusted for some files
>for it to to work better. I'd love to have some suggestions!
>
>
>  
>
ok, i'll prepare seperate binary releases for every working chipset. i 
also put related 4.2.0 version of 2d driver into it. surely i cannot 
test mga and savage releases. i'll away for two weeks from my computer 
(have exams) after that, i will have enough time to do.