From: <st...@ne...> - 2000-12-07 03:21:05
|
Thanks, Jeff. I have no idea what modify_ldt does, but I straced a run of the JVM under the normal kernel and found it was returning 0 (at least in these two cases) so I implemented a one-line modify_ldt in UML that returns 0. The result was that Java hung. I did not strace that run so I don't know what was up. At that point I sent the mail. stewart On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Jeff Dike wrote: > st...@ne... said: > > modify_ldt(0x11, 0xbf7ffa24, 0x10) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not > > implemented) > > This says it all, as far as running this particular jvm. UML doesn't > implement the i386-specific system calls. It shouldn't crash the kernel > though. I'll look into that. > > > any ideas what I can do to get this working? > > Tell me what modify_ldt is supposed to do (or point me at some docs) and I'll > see if it can be implemented. > > Jeff > > |