From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2007-03-05 23:19:30
|
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:03:26AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > > No, RCX corruption is different - that happens when a sysexit is done > > from a system call where userspace wasn't prepared to save and restore > > RCX. sigreturn is the best example. > > Hmm... we should finally fix that, at some point. Or... now that you explain > it this way, it could even seem unfixable... is it? Or maybe sysreturn should > become a syscall where the return must happen through the slow return path > (iret), if that exists for x86_64. This is fixed, and has been for a while. The fix was, as you suggest, return through iret in this case. > > But, a 32-bit UML making mmap calls through sysenter indeed does not run > > very well. > > Has this been fixed? I've read that Chuck Ebbert had already fixed this in > your diary, but not sent the patch. Yup, and I'm going to resurrect that patch. > I'd open an entry in bugzilla for this sort of things. It also seems that > Jason Lunz's patch about max_low_pfn is not even in your tree It is, I just haven't updated the site with it yet. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com |