Re: [uml-user] Static Multicast Routing on UML...

[frank e. <pri...@gm...>]

Hi UML'ers,

OK, NEVERMIND!  It all works fine...I just can't type...

Best Regards,
Ben Evans

On 1/27/06, frank evans <pri...@gm...> wrote:
>
> Hi UML'ers,
>
> Well, you have all been helpful with my previous problems, so now I have
> another question:
>
> 1)  I want to set up a UML with 3 ethernet ports - eth0, eth1, and eth2 -
> each being connected to a separate virtual network.  From reading about t=
he
> daemon, it seems I can get this done.  I do a cd ~/Desktop/UML/linux-
> 2.4.28 to get to the folder where all my Linux stuff is kept.  I plan to
> keep the uml_switch daemon sockets here, too.
>
> a)  I launch the uml_switch 3 times using uml_switch -unix ./Sx where x =
=3D
> 0, 1, and 2.  That gives me 3 separate instances of uml_switch running
> each with its own virtual socket.
>
> b)  I launch linux with ./linux ubd0=3D./root_fs eth0=3Ddaemon,192.168.0.=
10,unix,./S0
> eth1=3Ddaemon, 192.168.0.11,unix,./S2 eth2=3Ddaemon,192.168.0.12,./S3 whi=
ch
> then boots up linux.  I explicitly assigned IP addresses to each of the
> virtual sockets just so I could keep direct control of those socket IP
> assignments on the host, and so I would know what they were.
>
> c)  Now, on the UML, when I do an ifconfig to set up eth0, for example if=
config
> eth0 192.168.0.10, I get an error message SIOCSIFFLAGS: No such file or
> directory.  So I try it again with a different address, but I get the sam=
e
> error message.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben Evans
>
> On 1/27/06, frank evans <pri...@gm...> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, and another UML'er has pointed me to patches he used successfully
> > to compile with gcc4.  I'm going to give them a try...
> >
> >
> > On 1/27/06, Blaisorblade <bla...@ya... > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday 27 January 2006 19:52, frank evans wrote:
> > > > I changed the defconfig in arch/um to include CONFIG_IP_MROUTE and
> > > that set
> > > > it up correctly...
> > > >
> > > > Much thanks to all...
> > >
> > > > Now I have another question:
> > >
> > > > I patched linux-2.4.28 with the uml patch 2.4.27-1, did the configs=
,
> > > make,
> > > > etc.  If I make linux on one host, running Fedora Core 3, with a
> > > > gcc3.4.2everything works fine.  If I make linux on a different host=
,
> > > > running Fedora
> > > > Core 4, with a gcc 4.0.0, I get a bunch of compile warnings about
> > > > conflicting signage, and so forth.  I wonder what might be causing
> > > this.
> > >
> > > I fixed that problem in 2.6, but since Linux 2.4 does not support Gcc
> > > 4.0, I
> > > decided not to fix that error - I don't know if other problems may
> > > arise.
> > >
> > > > I
> > > > would not have thought there would be that much difference between
> > > the
> > > > gcc's.
> > >
> > > Instead there is a lot of difference... until a very few (1-2)
> > > releases ago
> > > you could still see patches as "fix this which doesn't compile with
> > > gcc 4".
> > >
> > > --
> > > Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's
> > > "Doh!".
> > > Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ
> > > 215621894)
> > > http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade<http://www.user-mode-lin=
ux.org/%7Eblaisorblade>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___________________________________
> > > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice: chiama da PC a telefono a tariffe
> > > esclusive
> > > http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> >
>