Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Ok, I build x86-64 -skas0, and it still segfaults.

SourceForge Headquarters 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 454-5900

On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 05:32:10PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Sunday 13 November 2005 13:20, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 November 2005 20:32, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:36:41PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > > Stub registers -
> > > >         0 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         1 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         2 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         3 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         4 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         5 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         6 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         7 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         8 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         9 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         10 - 0
> > > >         11 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         12 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         13 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         14 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         15 - ffffffffffffffff
> > > >         16 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         17 - 33
> > > >         18 - 292
> > > >         19 - 9090909090909090
> > > >         20 - 2b
> > >
> > > I remain baffled by this.  There is nothing valid there.  At the very
> > > least RSP and RIP should be reasonable, and they're not.
> >

I understand this a bit better.  We have some signal frame corruption going
on.  When there's a signal return, somehow RSP is pointing at all these
no-ops.

				Jeff