From: Peder C. <pc...@po...> - 2004-11-23 20:59:08
|
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 20:42, you wrote: > On Tuesday 23 November 2004 20:22, Peder Chr. N=F8rgaard wrote: > > > > I invoke "uml_switch -tap tap0" but no "tap0" net device pops up. > > "ifconfig" denies the existence of "tap0", "ifupdown" does not react to > > the invocation, and the "/proc/net/dev" file has no "tap0" entry. > > That is not supposed to create tap0, just to use it. > Use tunctl to create the file, and go read the "Virtual Networking" > tutorial link on the main site. > I stand corrected; this is the danger of using a smart system like Debian t= hat=20 does a lot of things for you so you don't really get to learn the basics. = =20 Well, I still think the benefits of Debian outweighs the dangers. Thanks for your answer; it really helped me to get this particular system=20 running. The thing is, Debian packaging of uml-utilities calls tunctl for= =20 you and creates the tap0 entry automatically - but only if you spell=20 correctly the relevant line in the tap0 stanza of the /etc/network/interfac= es=20 file. Which I didn't. Now, when I spell correctly, it works like a charm. So, th= e=20 answer is, to prevent *Debian* uml_switch from registering net device "tap0= ":=20 just make a spelling error in the "tap0" stanza! > > I invoke "uml_switch -tap tap0" but no "tap0" net device pops up. > > And this config cannot=20 > work anywhere - not even on 2.6. You probably were using a subtly differe= nt > config when it worked. Sorry, here I was not precise. The invocation also has a "-unix=20 <filenameofctl>" option. Thanks again =2D-=20 Peder Chr. N=F8rgaard e-mail: pc...@po... Gefionsvej 19 spejder-e-mail: ha...@ga... DK-8230 =C5byh=F8j tel: +45 87 44 11 99 Denmark mob: +45 30 91 84 31 |