From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2005-04-22 01:38:19
|
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:27:50PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote: > Here are the patches (tarball attached), that I've applied to > UML 2.6.11 + incrementals, before adding s390-files. > These patches are tested a bit on x86, but not on x86_64. The COMMAND_LINE_SIZE patch was required because this was conflicting with the userspace s390 COMMAND_LINE_SIZE? I think this is true because in the kernel, asm-s390/setup.h doesn't get pulled in. This stems from the fact that my tree had add_arg in os-Linux/util.c, which seems wrong. Blaisorblade had it moved to um_arch.c, which is right, and where it is in my tree now. So, I think UML_COMMAND_LINE_SIZE is not needed, and I've removed it. Jeff |