Re: [uml-user] Difference between sf.net's 2.6.6 patch and BlaisorBlade's?

[BlaisorBlade <bla...@ya...>]

Alle 07:09, gioved=EC 10 giugno 2004, uml ha scritto:
> Is there a difference?  If so, which is recommended as the 'latest' (even
> if it's not considered stable) patch?

If they don't match exactly, something went wrong; but I (yes, it's me the=
=20
maintainer, but a lot more people deserve credit, especially Ingo Molnar an=
d=20
Jeff Dike) should have uploaded exactly the same patch on both sites... and=
 I=20
never got ANY valid reports with either the 2.4.25, 2.6.3 and 2.6.6 patches=
;=20
older patches had, indeed, some problems.

> I still need to switch -O2 to -O1 in Makefile and arch/um/Makefile using
> gcc 3.3.3 regardless.. but I think that's a gcc or SuSE thing.

Yes, I think that a vanilla gcc 3.3.3 would solve the problem (maybe SuSE u=
sed=20
a pre-release)... but I'm not sure about this (see my other mail about this=
).
=2D-=20
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729