Re: [uml-user] 64-bit architectures

[Bryan O'S. <bo...@se...>]

On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 12:30, David Jones wrote:
> I haven't tried this yet, but I'm guessing UML won't work on a 64-bit 
> machine since the linux kernel occupies a different address space than on 
> a 32-bit machine.

That depends.  You can run a 32-bit UML fine on, for example, x86_64.  I
don't know anything about Itanic's support for 32-bit binaries under
Linux, so I can't comment there.

As for more general 64-bit support, watch this space.

	<b