From: Ronald P. <ron...@un...> - 2002-12-23 06:24:37
|
You are correct, wrong list. I do not have the disc rpms, I have iso, so I need to still download the rpms. I am downloading everything and trying it tonight. Ill see what happens. Thanks alot. Ron On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 00:06, Roger Binns wrote: > > OK, I am trying to use umlbuilder and I am sort of confused still. > > You should post UML Builder issues to the UML Builder mailing > lists. Details are at http://umlbuilder.sourceforge.net/contacts.shtml > > > It > > says you need to have a directory of RPMs where it can look to build > > your distro or something like that. > > That is correct. UML Builder can't do the install directly from the > distro CDs (it is way too complicated and error prone). Consequently > it needs all the RPMs in one directory. You can either copy them > off the CDs, or download them. > > > Where do you download these rpms? Im doing RH8 for now and have gone to > > a mirror > > > > ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/linux/redhat/8.0/en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/ > > That looks like all of them. You can use wget to grab all of them, > although it will be about 1.8GB of stuff, so you'll probably want > to get them via an alternative means. > > > Is this what you mean by getting the rpms? > > Yes. > > > Do I need them all, what is the minimum? > > If you have the CDs, it is easiest to grab them all. If you really > want a minimum set, you'll need to look in > /usr/lib/uml/umlbuilder/profiles/Redhat8.0.p > and note which ones are needed for whichever modules you want. > You'll actually need more than that, since some of those will > have dependencies on others. It will take a fair amount of > trial and error. > > > Is anything shared with the host? > > No, because that is the way that UML works. Although if your host > is Redhat 8, then you will have the CDs and hence the RPMs. > > If you want to 'reuse' the host kernel and software, a solution > like http://www.freevsd.org/ may suit you better. > > > I promise when I know what I am doing Ill write a book for this to fend > > off people like myself. > > I'd love to update the UML Builder documentation to make things > clearer! Please email me the bits you think can be improved. > > Roger > |