Re: [uml-devel] Freezes under network load, multiple versions

[Matthew B. <ma...@by...>]

On Wednesday 02 April 2003 08:55, Lynn Kerby wrote:
> On 2003.04.01 14:09 Matthew Bloch wrote:
> >Do either of these look out of the ordinary?  I'm not best placed to judge
> > :)
> >
[snip]
>
> They both look quite out of the ordinary to me.  Until I built my kernel
> with '-g' I had all kinds of problems getting gdb to print valid data. 

Thanks, I'll try that on our next kernel build.  I can get this crash to 
happen on demand so if it makes diagnosis easier I can get another strack 
trace from a kernel built with -g.

> Maybe you can get the unformatted data simply by dumping the addresses? 
> The structures are only 60 bytes long each but the example below dumps 80
> (20 words).  The addresses are taken from your stack traceback.
>
> x/20xw 0xa03c4420
> x/20xw 0xa02736e4

(gdb) x/20xw 0xa03c4420
0xa03c4420:     0xa03ceec0      0xa03653d8      0x00000000      0x00000001
0xa03c4430:     0x00006220      0x00000001      0x00000000      0x0000399a
0xa03c4440:     0x005fffe0      0x00000020      0x005fffe0      0x00000020
0xa03c4450:     0x00000010      0x00000001      0x00000008      0x00000008
0xa03c4460:     0x00000000      0xa14f9000      0x00000000      0xa1038260

(gdb) x/20xw 0xa02736e4
0xa0273734 <init_task_union+14132>:     0x00000000      0xa0273754      
0xa02737ac      0xa013215f
0xa0273744 <init_task_union+14148>:     0xa03653b8      0x00000004      
0x0000003c      0x00000000
0xa0273754 <init_task_union+14164>:     0x00000001      0x00000010      
0x0000000f      0x00000000
0xa0273764 <init_task_union+14180>:     0x000c1200      0xbfffb000      
0x00000000      0x00001000
0xa0273774 <init_task_union+14196>:     0xa2762000      0x00000200      
0x000000ff      0xffffffff

-- 
Matthew Bloch                             Bytemark Hosting
                                  tel. +44 (0) 8707 455026
                        http://www.bytemark-hosting.co.uk/
          Dedicated Linux hosts from 15ukp ($26) per month