Re: [uml-devel] skas mode patch

[Michael R. <mc...@sa...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Dike <jd...@ka...> writes:
    Jeff> mc...@sa... said:
    >> skas2? I applied host-skas3.patch. Did I apply too new a patch for my
    >> UML then? 

    Jeff> To keep things simple, I made a given UML looks for a specific version of
    Jeff> the skas patch, and no other.  And the skas patches are distinct from each
    Jeff> other, so one can't be mistaken for another.

    Jeff> So, you need to apply the skas2 patch to the host or use a UML which looks
    Jeff> for skas3.

  Okay. That isn't clear at all from the web site. One assumes that one just
takes the highest numbered patch.
  How close is skas3 to being stable? (i.e. that we won't see an incompatible
skas4). This is important, because I could easily have multiple revisions of
UML on a given host.

  What UML revision is the first skas3 one?

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mc...@sa... http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBPib3voqHRg3pndX9AQF1MwQApWXxaNFSayCiAF1+rViXdsIvc8OOSpjC
NZGQPveSSB3OiqqjD1J3/lXzuIzkIHd+WQrxyuDEfZZ6+iE+4ZfPsTOo1Wi49dzP
ymJiE0uMB50xhf73ZCDnZSpn9Do9B+/GT5z9cBBmgedGlo0bEfyCU+fxTZNRHfU9
Q2heevwx/WA=
=61Y9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----