From: Jan H. <bu...@uc...> - 2002-11-13 08:23:32
|
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:47:15AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > bu...@uc... said: > > It used to be that one could inspect stacks of different UML processes > > by attaching the gdb to the respective threads, while attaching it to > > pid 1 (or any other it couln't normally attach to) would give the > > actually scheduled process. How will this work when these are no > > longer separate processes? > > Don't know. Maybe there's a way to get the kernel process to jump onto the > appropriate stack. Well, you wrote it;-). Perhaps a special function to switch the memory maps that could be called from gdb command prompt could do the trick. It would be a good thing to have. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bu...@uc...> |