Re: [Unichrome-devel] Issues with unichrome on K8M800
Brought to you by:
dwdeath
From: Philip P. <phi...@re...> - 2005-07-18 06:02:38
|
Well, I got the CVS sources for the VIA drivers and built them as part of 6.8.1 (thanks Terry). The only change I had to make was to add in my motherboard: http://www.msicomputer.com/product/p_spec.asp?model=K8MM-V&class=mb and I've added the diff at the end of this mail. I then tried to startx with a fairly simple xorg.conf file (which I didn't attach, but I could if you all think it would help.) Saw the messages: (II) VIA(0): ViaI2CInit (II) VIA(0): ViaI2CBus1Init (II) VIA(0): I2C bus "I2C bus 1" initialized. (II) VIA(0): ViaI2cBus2Init (II) VIA(0): I2C bus "I2C bus 2" initialized. (II) VIA(0): ViaI2CBus3Init (II) VIA(0): I2C bus "I2C bus 3" initialized. (II) Loading sub module "ddc" (II) LoadModule: "ddc" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/libddc.a (II) Module ddc: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 6.8.2, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 0.7 (II) VIA(0): I2C device "I2C bus 1:ddc2" registered at address 0xA0. (II) VIA(0): I2C device "I2C bus 1:ddc2" removed. but didn't think twice about it. Perhaps 1 of the 3 I2C busses isn't connected... Then I noticed: (II) VIA(0): ViaValidMode: Validating 640x350 (31500) (II) VIA(0): ViaModePrimaryVGAValid (II) VIA(0): Not using default mode "640x350" (no clock available for mode) (II) VIA(0): Not using default mode "320x175" (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan) (etc). I've never seen "no clock available for mode". This is a curious one. And finally: (WW) VIA(0): Mode pool is empty (EE) VIA(0): No valid modes found ... (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. Anyone want to venture a guess? I'd be happy to try out a patch or gather more debugging info. I haven't hacked X in 20 years, though... So I'm a bit rusty... and things are very different from the old Vaxstation-II hardware. ;-) -Philip |