From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (K. ) - 2001-12-06 09:45:58
|
bu...@op... (Kevin A. Burton) writes: >> Can you M-x load-library RET files.el RET (the ".el" part is important) to >> generate a better backtrace? > > Hm. What would that do? Re-defun standard functions? Yes. >> Also, loading the *.el versions for the VC files might help to improve the >> backtrace. > > Ok. Because they wouldn't contain bytecode? If so I think that is > a good idea. Yes, after loading the *.el files the backtrace shows Lisp code rather than bytecode. Much easier to read. > back to the issue at hand. > > When I got home I tried to duplicate the error. It works now :(. > It happend at least 20 times in a row earlier today but now is not > working ... ug. > > I am sure it will pop up again at which time I will try to get a > better stacktrace. I hate Heisenbugs, too. Will wait for your report. kai -- Simplification good! Oversimplification bad! (Larry Wall) |