Re: [Tnfox-discussion] enhancements to scrollbar range
Brought to you by:
ned14
From: Niall D. <s_s...@ne...> - 2005-01-09 14:15:12
|
On 7 Jan 2005 at 18:28, ja...@io... wrote: > > The OpenSSL library provides a good bignum implementation. However, > > I think the key here is to use templates - then you can easily and > > transparently extend the paradigm with no source alteration. > > It doesn't have to be too fancy to do the ops needed for the > scrolling. Maybe a "tiny" bignum. I see you are linking in some > OpenSSL libraries already, so if that's already included, I guess it > would be the right choice. Precisely. > > Don't suppose you'd like to make these changes and supply a patch? > > I'd need it in a certain form to make fusing alterations from FOX > > back into it easier but I will maintain it afterwards. > > I could send the mods I made to 1.0.30 that were necessary to create > the 64 bit int version of FXScrollArea, FXScrollbar and FXTable. The > mods were very small ... just to the parameters pos, range and > dragpoint. That would be useful. I can diff the changes you made to shortcut what I'd have to do. > I can volunteer to do it as templates, but it would have to be to the > fox sources since I haven't gotten your build environment to work. Did > you have something else in mind? Jay Well as it happens I have a week coming up at the end of January which is more or less totally empty. I plan to release v0.85 during that. I'd like to get templatised GUI editables into TnFOX at some point, preferably before Tn starts getting a lot of GUI components into it though all changes would remain source compatible (via typedefs and default template parameters) with FOX. If the TnFOX build system isn't working for you, that's a bug and it needs fixing. I can't fix it if I don't know what the problem is, so please go into details. Cheers, Niall |