From: Lars M. G. <la...@ga...> - 2009-05-04 18:18:58
|
* Johannes Schmidt > > This looks like a stand-off however as both Larses hold committer > status > in the project and Klaus does not this is a "b wins", isn't it? Does anyone object to that solution, I guess is the question. > Well, what I'd like to see is that implementors are not absolutely > forced to implement IRIs (for whatever reasons). Lars H. has made a > proposal how implementors can get over the demand for IRIs, and I > think > we should spent some more time on this. Any thoughts? I'm kind of confused by this whole discussion, I must admit. The TMDM says all locators are IRIs. Why don't we just leave it at that? If there's any reason to use (or allow the use of) URIs instead, I'd quite like to hear them. --Lars M. http://www.garshol.priv.no/tmphoto/ http://www.garshol.priv.no/blog/ |