From: Alberto B. <alb...@gm...> - 2007-12-17 21:27:09
|
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:40:59PM -0500, Jon Paul Maloy wrote: > I don't know much about Python, but it looks ok > to me, according to your description. Thanks! > Yo may have noticed that TIPC_ADDR_NAMESEQ > and TIPC_ADDR_MCAST in reality indicates the same > address type, i.e. they have the same value. > > Maybe that will simplify your code a little ? I actually haven't noticed! It doesn't simplify the code much, as I already support NAMESEQ, but it simplifies the conditionals a bit. Unless anybody has an objection (e.g. it shouldn't be used in new code anymore), I think I'll leave the constant exported just in case somebody is attached to it, because the benefit of removing it is really small, but add a small notice in the documentation about it being the same as NAMESEQ. Thanks, Alberto |