From: Torsten F. <to...@fa...> - 2013-07-15 22:23:04
|
Hi Frank, whenever I am unsure with licence I ask Marc, but as he frequently stated to me that MIT is compatible to us, I am quite sure to remember, that Apache 2.0 is compatible aswell -> Marc, am I right? Bootstrap is afaik based on less.js, which moved to Apache 2.0 three years ago. So if Apache 2.0 is good for us, this is not a blocker. Please confirm Marc. Greetz Torsten Am 16.07.2013 00:07, schrieb Frank Guthausen: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:28:47PM +0200, luciash wrote: >> >> AFAIK it wasn't clearly decided to wait after 12. See >> https://themes.tiki.org/Bootstrap+Transition+Preps#Questions Option 1. >> vs Option 2. >> What was decided? Yes, we decided to use Bootstrap 3 and it seems to >> be released as final pretty soon any day > > I feel a bit sad to say so but as far as I can see and tell, there are > still problems with the licence: > > https://github.com/twitter/bootstrap/blob/3.0.0-wip/LICENSE > > Quote: > | This is Apache License Version 2.0 > > As far as I remember the discussion about dual license weren't completed > with success a few months ago. Before anyone takes effort, this question > should be solved once and forever: will Bootstap 3 be available with any > compatible license for using it within the Tiki project? > > Maybe I missed something and the whole issue is solved already and > case closed, but I guess this should be acknowledged and announced > without any possibility for misunderstandings. > |