From: Marc L. <ma...@ma...> - 2003-12-29 00:22:45
|
Hi! Almost all features are optional in Tiki. I am convinced this one will be optional also. M ;-) -- Marc Laporte http://tikiwiki.org/UserPagemarclaporte Stephan Borg wrote: >On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 10:48, LIMBURG, Mark wrote: > > >>PROS >> >> * Web-based editing and control of templates/themes >> * Cloning and Exporting of themes >> * Different templates for different 'groups' within the same theme >> * Single point of backup (SQL backup grabs even more data) >> * DB cache for file speeds and less DB access/overhead >> * Version Control >> * Import directly from external source (with potential for auto-update!) >> * It's nifty :) >> * Better security facilities >> >>CONS >> >> * Annoying to code :P >> * More potential to fill DB >> * No/Broken cache would be a bad thing! >> * Issues outstanding with Images >> >>On a side point, images held in DB are about (on very general averages here) >>about 30% slower than file based images (can't find the URL, but just trust >>me hehehe). Now, with the trusty cache layer doing it's work, it's much >>better. >> >> >> > >Can I make a request that at least themes moving into DB be optional >feature ? > >I don't know if there are others out there like me that don't use the >themes to their full extent and definitely wouldn't want the DB being >bloated because of them. > > > > |